Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which of these is/was not a leap year (easy)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:51 PM
Original message
Which of these is/was not a leap year (easy)
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 07:53 PM by qwertyMike
1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this a trick question?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No
See post #2

Ask him/her why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OK, I'll bite... why not 2000? It is divisible by 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually, 2000 WAS a leap year...
All years divisable by 4 are leap years, except those years divisable by 100. The exception is that years divisible by 400 are leap years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. i know
i just assumed this was a trick question, so went with the year the Monkey Prez was selected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That was a leap backward a few hundred years, wasn't it?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Right!
The years with three zeros - 1000, 2000 and presumably (if they get there) 3000 are NOT leap years. I think this is to allow for the milliseconds not accounted for by regular leap years.

BUT

WHO CARES?

Was there a year 0000? (Puleeeeeeese don't start that debate again)

Most times I don't even know what day it is.

Mike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. They're all leap years. Check this out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Now I'm all f*cked up
Who started this thread anyway?

Oh wait - it was ME

Too much Xmas stress (ex-wife and kids and all that - glad to be HOME)

She told me she loved me after 16 years apart. I said nothing and jumped in the car and drove 230 miles home.
F*ckin' wimmen

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Oy.
Mr GoG's ex decided she loved him again not long after we started getting serious about each other. She had split up with him once before, after they'd been married about a year. 3 years after they got back together, six months after their 2nd kid was born, she decided she loved him, but wasn't "in love" with him. :eyes: 4 years later, I met him, and 6 months after that, she told him she wanted to give their marriage another try. He considered it, for the sake of the kids, until he found out that she was planning a ski trip with her boyfriend.

The woman is a serious control freak. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. 2008. I know this because I iz tres smart, unlike you dumbasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC