For me hands down it's the ones where the original post is something about a candidate (ie." Candidate X has a proven record of blah blah blah...") and contains some sort of article or listing of facts which really doesn't provide much insight but is more or less just a fluff piece.
But then the responses wherein an inordinate number of people responding pretend to be surprised and informed by this information and treat it like some great factual revelation when it's painfully clear they already support the candidate in question:
"Wow, that's great. Thanks for the information. Sounds like he/she may deserve serious consideration"
"I did not know that. This is great news and may put me in candidate X's camp!!!!"
"Oh my. Based off of this it seems like Candidate X is really the one to go for if (insert issue here) is important to me, which it most definitely is!"
I've seen some variation of this for most of the candidates but one candidate in particular seems to engender an extremely large number of these. I can't complain about them since they are good natured which is what amuses and entertains me about them
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.