|
Edited on Sun Apr-06-08 12:38 AM by Chan790
I'm thicker-skinned than that. I believe in an absolute right to express opinions, whatever they may be. Ms. Rhodes opinion on HC (or Lynne Cheney) is as valid as mine that Randi Rhodes is a hack and progressives are better off with her off-the-air.* I believe in free speech minimally-confined by jurisprudence and acceptance of the consequences of expressing such opinions.
Limiting speech and expression because you don't like the content is a slippery slope leading to a fascism of ideas. This is frankly a bedrock Democratic ideal, a foundation of our civil liberties. Those who disagree are no better than Presi-dunce Shrub and his Republican cronies.*
*- You see, they're opinions and not statements of fact. If you don't like someone's opinion, you're free to form and express your own opposing opinion. That's the brilliance of the first amendment. Not only do you have a right to say whatever you'd like (minimally-limited), you have a right to make an ass of yourself. Ms. Rhodes certainly did that.
|