Steven Seagal never made a bad movie.

Discuss.

Heh.

WRONG.

:P

I have to :rofl: at this.

"Above the Law" was about extra-legal CIA ops... Good subject.

"Hard to Kill" was about corrupt cops. Old news, but okay.

"Marked for Death" was lame... Jamaican Voodoo Posses? I prefer the ones in Predator II.

"Out for Justice" just sucked.

"Under Siege" was mildly amusing (primarily because of Tommy Lee Jones).

"Fire Down Below" was ecological in origin and worth it for that alone.


I think for an action star, Seagal has done some decent stuff. At least he's not an asshat. I THINK he's a Buddhist in real life and I can respect that. But once he started hiring stunt-doubles to do things he could never do (like jumping kicks, for example) he definitely jumped the shark.

And, yes, I can offer an opinion on just about any martial arts star known to American cinema and his or her movies, choreography, skill level, and overall value as an icon.

I just got finished a couple of days ago explaining to my sons what kind of raging dumbass Chuck Norris is--and that's not even getting into the epic fail of choreography of STARTING a fight with a spinning back kick.

If I remember correctly it went:

"I am your worse nightmare- A EPA agent with a gun"

can only get overseas. I think he kept Hong Kong in the black for a while there. LOL (Or at least Ebay.)

to keep track of the low-rent martial artist movies coming out of America... And the "artists."

Not just okay, but GREAT??

Help me out here....

That one was great.

...Seagal could become merely bad.

who's better - Rolph Lundgren or Stephen Segal?

Or wait, there are a few others - Charles Bronson! Or hmmm....Chuck Norris. Oh well, Norris is a crazy RW douche. So he sucks....

Has been for a number of years now, and he still could out-act Steven Segal.

Even when he was Charles Buchinski and played a prize fighter in "Pat and Mike."
Yes, he was a supporting player in a Hepburn/Tracy movie. Ask me anything about old movies. Go ahead.

...sad ending to their love story.

:P

It wasnt good either.

Is when Segal's character plunges 35,000 feet to his doom.

then yes, he technically never made a "bad" movie... he's pretty consistent.

:P

Actually, I like his movies - he's a particularly cool kind of bad ass with his bone breaking moves and stoic look. But he does have a couple clunkers - the one on the ship with Tommy Lee Jones is a bit of a stinker, though Jones manages to hold it together with his brilliance.

:rofl:

:P

All his movies are horrible, not merely "bad". :P

But he made plenty of terrible ones.