How can I help keep Leerers to keep their eyes up here?

I dress more conservatively than a nun..

yes, I'm heavenly blessed, but its not as though they are unique..

I'm assuming, went along with the choice of gown.

Redstone

Look them in the eye, men who do this want to be in control.

Take away their control.

I have enough manners about me to keep the eyes up when I'm talking to someone, though.

:shrug:

A tee-shirt that says, "What's that on the back of your head?"

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...of big ol' honkin' penises (penii???)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Be prepared, though, for some of the Leerers' heads to ASPLODE!!!!!
.

Went to a wedding once. Bridesmaids wore these ridiculously low cut dresses. Eyes just kept going down there. I tried fighting it. It did not work. It was like some unseen force kept pulling the eyes down there.

"Eyes, eyes, eyes, eyes, not looking at your breasts, not looking at your breasts, not looking at. . . yep, looking at your breasts, goddamnit I suck".

One of them even called me on it (she was a friend, would have been far more embarrassing if it were a stranger). "DUDE, it's the dresses. You GOTTA know I don't mean to, it's just happening . . . like just NOW, DAMN it!!!"

We're wired quite badly, I'm told.

but I have these totally covered up...and now its summer if I think I'm wearing a top that comes close to being low, I wear a cami-top underneath

I can't explain it. Lots of guys love breasts. The worst part about that whole wedding thing was, I don't even care about breasts all that much. I felt weird that it was almost like an involuntary action for the eyes to shift down there.

That marriage lasted a whole 7 years. Mine's still intact. Maybe it's because I learned to divert my eyes :rofl:

I won't play that game. Seen two, seen them all. Just variations on the same theme. Outside of artificial means, no woman can take credit for her large boobs. Besides, I've seen women who are relatively small-breasted who are as sexy as hell.

That being said, it would seem that most men have a biological and evolutionary imperative to look at large breasts. You can have class though and notice without staring. Like Seinfeld said, it's like looking at the sun.

some of us are just large and wish to not be choked by our clothing
not daring anybody to look (my that says something, but not about the women)
and know perfectly well, as the OP says - wouldn't matter a bit if chest was covered with a heavy burka, most would still gawk

happened at work, and that's not cool or fair for the guys either.

ever wearing to work..I'm a little bit too well blessed to need to draw more attention to my bust..that's not what this is about..

Men are pigs. We are, it's true. There are some of us who have grown up and learned some manners; we glance at your assets (hey, well mannered doesn't mean dead) but keep our eyes on your face in conversation out of respect for your personhood. Others among us have no manners, and will practically drool at the sight of fabulous mammary glands. I suggest you associate with mature men (who exist in all age brackets) and try to avoid immature men (who also exist in all age brackets).

I have to wonder what "more conservatively than a nun" means, though.

Unless you wear a box, or make a kind of shape hiding thing out of a kite or umbrella and wear it around.

...and make sure you have the ruler. The ruler is what scares most of them away.

Liz: It's just with Ed here, it's no wonder I always bring my flat-mates out and then that only exacerbates things.
Shaun: What do you mean?
Liz: Well you guys hardly get on, do you?
Shaun: No, what does "exacerbate" mean?
Liz: It means um, to make things worse.

:rofl:

BTW Google pictures search for sexy nun was nothing but win.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...looked, Sister!!!!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

.

In The Naked Ape: A Zoologist's Study of the Human Animal, he makes the case that breasts evolved the way they did because they attract male eyes. Breasts mimic the prominent sexual feature of our female ancestors who walked on all fours (the buttocks).
I am sorry to say, I think it's hard-wired.

So, unless he is making a conscious effort to be respectful, his eyes are going to wander there.

rollin eyes

i bet if the guys bulges were evident the eyes of most all of us would be much lower than the face or chest.

Based on the prevalence of enhancing features in men's underwear catalogs, I'd say you are also correct about male bulges.

I think he's talking about why they look the way they do.

I think...

They do have maintain their original purpose, to feed babies, but the shape that is retained after nursing is complete is to attract or arouse men.

Humans are one of the few animals that maintain breasts when not nursing and this is a very likely explanation.
You can ignore the evolution/natural selection, but it still exists.

sexual urge would give a female an advantage to mating.

it is all about and for..... YOU. lol lol

it is all about and for..... YOU. lol lol

we are talking about a fairly early form of man that wasn't as enlightened as man is today.

From wiki:

Some zoologists (notably Desmond Morris) believe that the shape of female breasts evolved as a frontal counterpart to that of the buttocks, the reason being that while other primates mate in the rear-entry position, humans, because of their upright posture, are more likely to successfully copulate by mating face to face, the so-called missionary position. Morris suggested in 1967 that a secondary sexual characteristic on a woman's chest would have encouraged this in more primitive incarnations of the human race, and a face-on encounter may have helped found a relationship between partners beyond merely a sexual one.<13> However, this theory has since been generally disregarded due to the discovery that other primates, such as orangutans, routinely mate in the face-to-face position even though the females do not have prominent breasts.

but they are hanging from their arms from branches as they do it!
Their hands aren't free.

One current theory is that the human breast developed as a secondary sexual characteristic once we began walking around on all twos (Homo erectus). Bipedalism hid the primary sexual organs so other sexual identifiers of reproductive capability evolved.

that the constant full non-lactating breasts is a notifier to the male.
So yes, full breasts on humans are theorized to attract or signify fertility to the male.
Why on earth would eternally full breasts be of benefit to the female (except indirectly).

always works for me.

in the "something's wrong with him" category, but give me a well-shaped pair of shoulders, or that wonderful curve that runs from the lower back down to the hips of a woman any day...

The size of a woman's bosom is immaterial to me; it's what that bosom is attached to that counts.

Yes, I'm weird. So be it.

Redstone

There are plenty of women with, um, noteworthy assets in the thoracic region who hardly would get a second glance from me, and IMO there are literally millions of beautiful women with small breasts. I myself am less a connoisseur of breasts than other female features, anyway. I am sure thinking such thoughts will lead me to be in trouble with my wife, so I'll leave off there.

The one thing that is kind of, well, repulsive is over-sized melons. Like, unnatural. What's the attraction with that? If they don't look real who cares how large they are? Well, some men do, clearly.

look like the woman had a pair of half soccer balls welded to her chest.

Yuck.

Redstone

or a man being looked at with disgust because some will fixate on his beer gut. They're both being dismissed as people. Those who leer or ridicule will rarely make an attempt to get to know the person behind the body, no matter how stimulated or repulsed they may be at the object of their gaze.