but I think a larger part of it was that those people are bad writers.
He was experimental as a writer, part of that was a belief that literature should not be linear in structure. (He liked to joke that readability was the only reason he didn't intentionally put words in the wrong sentence order. He liked footnotes because they interrupted the flow of reading...he meant them to be read as breaks in the narrative and some of the ones in Infinite Jest are utterly tangential and run pages in length.) Unless you're a pretty great writer, it's kind of hard to emulate any of that without writing badly. As my college creative writing professor told us, "rules exist for bad writers". Wallace didn't write within the rules, no matter what it was he was working on.
Also, a correction...
A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again was the essay collection.
Broom of the System was a novella. I get them confused because I read them back-to-back in one sitting one afternoon...neither one is very long.
I don't feel that I'm answering or explaining any of this very well. I've included two samples of his writing to show what I cannot. They're both journalism pieces so they're not as different as I'd like but I could not find a book excerpt for
Infinite Jest.
The String TheoryBy David Foster Wallace
Originally published in the July 1996 issue of EsquireWhen Michael T. Joyce of Los Angeles serves, when he tosses the ball and his face rises to track it, it looks like he’s smiling, but he’s not really smiling -- his face’s circumoral muscles are straining with the rest of his body to reach the ball at the top of the toss’s rise. He wants to hit it fully extended and slightly out in front of him -- he wants to be able to hit emphatically down on the ball, to generate enough pace to avoid an ambitious return from his opponent. Right now, it’s 1:00, Saturday, July 22, 1995, on the Stadium Court of the Stade Jarry tennis complex in Montreal.
Read more:
http://www.esquire.com/features/sports/the-string-theory-0796#ixzz0tzLu7EvL Consider the LobsterBy David Foster Wallace
Originally published in the August 2004 issue of GourmetTourism and lobster are the midcoast region’s two main industries, and they’re both warm-weather enterprises, and the Maine Lobster Festival represents less an intersection of the industries than a deliberate collision, joyful and lucrative and loud. The assigned subject of this article is the 56th Annual MLF, July 30 to August 3, 2003, whose official theme was “Lighthouses, Laughter, and Lobster.” Total paid attendance was over 80,000, due partly to a national CNN spot in June during which a Senior Editor of a certain other epicurean magazine hailed the MLF as one of the best food-themed festivals in the world.
Read more:
http://www.gourmet.com/magazine/2000s/2004/08/consider_the_lobster