Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mansplaining: Worst Catch Phrase Ever

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 07:45 PM
Original message
Mansplaining: Worst Catch Phrase Ever
There is a new catch phrase that is setting the Feminist
blogosphere a buzz. It's called "Mansplaining" it was
first used a couple of years ago, but in the past six
months it has taken off, and is widely and wrongly used
in debates.

Mansplaining means you are beginning condensing,
patronizing and feel that you are correct because you
are the man in the conversation.

How utterly ridiculous that concept is. It takes any
robust debate down to the gutter level, and is equivalent
to little kids who would scream out "Your
an idiot" during arguments with their classmates.

If there is a debate on any subject, it doesn't have to be
political, it could even be about Apples or Pears, if you
have a different opinion, a different point of view with
a poster, and that poster is female and you are
male, the word "MANSPLAINER" will be shouted
from the rooftops from anyone who disagrees
with your point of view.

For example just the other day there was a debate on the
always interesting "hand mirror" site, about if the Hamilton Casino
is being honest about wanting to open 24/7 to attract high
end punters from Asia, or are they really after, the local's
money, which could lead to social economic problems.

I took the view that they are after the Visiting Asian Market,
while the poster "Stargazer" believe this wasn't the case and
they were after the local market, thus causing problems for
the local community.

Well, let the Mansplaining comments begin, apparently I was
Mansplaining, and then I was Mansplaining again by explaining
that I just have a different point of view.

Of course it wasn't a case of mansplaining, I was just
pointing out my thoughts on the subject, like the
poster "Stargazer" was pointing out their's.

I wonder how the posters would of commented if I had
of been a female? they couldn't use the term Mansplainer,
and that is where using the term Mansplainer falls down.


You are basically saying any male that is debating a female
on any given topic is a Mansplainer, and that is not even close to
reality.

Oh for the record, I thought the poster
"Stargazer" was male, although it didnt matter to me what gender
she was.

It matters to some people though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that somehow derived from "I Love Lucy"? "Let me 'splain sometin' to you."
Just curious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not sure
According to the feminist blogsphere, itm was created by a Feminist Blogger a couple of years back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I bet I'm right on that one.
There's a great moment in one of the episodes where Lucy uses the term - "WHOA boy - You've got some 'SPLAIN' to do."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, I've never heard it. And since I'm a man who knows all kinds of man things,
if I don't know this term then it's clearly bullshit. Which it is. Q, E, and a big ol' testosterone-infused D...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Its used here in newzealand a lot
By some feminist bloggers, during debates and comments thread, its getting to the crazy stage, where there cant
be a debate at all on carious topics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is why I don't usually get into debates with people who I know I won't
see eye to eye with. Waste of my time and theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The weird thing is
Its not so much debates, than discussions, that the word mansplaining is banded around.
It's getting to the point that the once lively discussions are just overtaken by the
people who can scream the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. During the Feminist movement of the 60s and 70s there were a lot of men
Edited on Sat May-28-11 09:12 PM by lunatica
who argued sincerely that women were inferior mentally. They believed women just simply were not as intelligent as men. I think the term nails them perfectly. I can't tell you how many times men were condescending about any number of subject. For example, I'm an artist and even though some men knew that they would still lecture me about what art is. But in all honesty I don't know any men who still think that. At least none I talk to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. the term is good to use in that suitation
Over on the newzealand feminist blogosphere though, its used in nearly ever thread/post on any subject, its just thrown out
there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ah, the enlightened young who have never experienced this first hand.
Patriarchy produces insufferable idjits who regularly practice "mansplainin'". Glad to hear there's a label for it.:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC