Mark Penn: I Wanted To Attack Obama More Aggressively, But Others On Campaign Held Me Back
By Greg Sargent - June 12, 2008, 9:51AM
GQ is about to post a very interesting, and long, interview with Mark Penn that has a bunch of news in it.
We have some advance excerpts. Here, for instance, is Penn saying that he recognized early on what a phenomenon Obama is and wanted to attack Obama more aggressively, particularly on Iraq, but unnamed others on the campaign opposed it:
GQ: How did you underestimate him {meaning Barack Obama}?
Mark Penn: I think I never underestimated it, that once you had that kind of candidate, that that kind of candidate could be real trouble. And that if that candidate... You know, if Obama won Iowa, it would really change, dramatically change, the situation going forward. And consequently, I really wanted to question Obama as early as possible.
GQ: You wanted to hit him harder?
Well, I wanted to question the basic underpinning of his campaign... His problems in his campaign were (1) that he didn't have the usual experience of somebody running for president, and (2) that the positions he took on Iraq--you know, that were revered by the press--didn't really hold up when you look through his record in the Senate.
GQ: Why didn't you?
Well, I started down that road.... President Clinton took on the Iraq back-and-forth. But the rest of the campaign didn't want to tackle Iraq. They always felt that that was a losing proposition for her, and they always pulled it back.
more...
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/mark_penn_i_wanted_to_go_after.php