Spam Dean Spam!

Bill Hotaling, owner of New York-based consulting firm Noreast Technology, was among those who were surprised to be receiving e-mail from the Dean campaign.

"I got the Dean message at an e-mail address that I have not used in several years, and I did not sign up with Dean for anything," said Hotaling. "I was very surprised to see Dean sending spam. I can't imagine him being so tech savvy if he is resorting to that.

"My impression? I hate spam, so I was not happy they spammed me," added Hotaling. "If he did in fact send those e-mails from his campaign, then yes it would impact my opinion of him and his campaign."

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,60086,00.html

Spam Dean Spam!

Go Dennis Go!

...and interesting that a signature to tout someone wouldn't have one of the many powerful statements made by the person they are touting, rather than making another candidate the focus of the statement...what's up with that?

....like my sig line. It touts me. And Strong Bad. My sig line does not talk about how much Strong Bad hates Homestar Runner.

I don't know which one he hates more.

Now, does blatant flame bait get DELETED?

lol..

....that's clever. Nice one.

but I can see that getting really tired, really quickly.

Maybe someone signed y'up, you dope.

Go Dennis Go...break the US the way you busted Cleveland.

F+

http://www.granitestaters.com/guide/dean.html

"In his August 4 CNN appearance, Dean said he would require the FDA to study medical uses of marijuana, which would constitute a major departure from normal FDA drug approval procedures. Moments later, Dean said he thinks "marijuana should be treated like every other drug in the process." In essence, Dean used his standard "we need a study" waffle which, in turn, was devastatingly parodied on Comedy Central's The Daily Show. His confusion of the issue, his earlier reversal and his actions have shown that medical marijuana patients can never trust him."

and Dennis ran a major US city into the ground. You pick.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I'd answer your question but I'd have to get negative

Not really, I just wanted to share the honor.

"So the banks pushed the city into default and Kucinich lost his next re-election bid because of First Energy's greed. Oh, yes, greed. Because in the 1990s, the people of Cleveland woke up to the fact that Dennis Kucinich had saved them all a ton of money. In 1998, the Cleveland City Council honored him for "having the courage and foresight to refuse to sell the city's municipal electric system," saying he had saved Clevelanders more than 300 million -- that 300 million that they would have paid to CEI if Kucinich had caved in. But he didn't. That doesn't seem to be his style."

http://www.counterpunch.org/dong08232003.html

Then follow it up with a cheap shot of your own? Nice, and ever so conducive to civil discourse.

Dean lied about the pot issue. He says he opposes it because there's not enough science. Even Nixon's commission advocated totally re-legalising it, so the idea that there's 'not enough science' is nonsense. Even 30 years ago, science had a better understanding of marijuana than it did of aspirin.

Dennis came into office with the city deeply in debt because of quasi-criminal behavior by the privately-owned power company. They were trying to do a get-rich-quick scheme, and he was elected because of his promise to stop them. He stopped them. In doing so, he saved Cleveland residents $200M to date, and it can only get better.

and saved Cleveland much. On the drug issue, he condemned medical pot in 96 or 97.

Gov. Dean has been consistent about this issue. Marijuana is an illegal drug. Period.

Dean wants to commission a FDA study to determine if marijuana does have legitimate medicinal uses. If it's determined that it does, he's said he'll support it as a treatment for certain medical conditions.

It SHOULD be treated like every other drug. If it had medicinal uses, it'll be approved for those conditions.

What, exactly, is your problem with this?

Do you actually believe what you're saying? Have you thought about it? Saying 'Marijuana is an illegal drug. Period' is utterly inane. It's an 'illegal drug' because, unlike oregano or catnip, it has been declared to be illegal. There is no science behind that at all. None. There was quite a lot of racism, and classism, but not one damn bit of science.

Dean's consistency has been the consistency of an elitist, racist Drug Warrior, not a scientist or physician. You should be apologising for his stance, if you have any respect at all for science and good sense.

i'm all for legalization of pot or at least decriminalization of it, but you don't have a chance in hell of getting elected if that's what you're advocating. he has stated many times that it's something that should be treated through rehab not prison. that's a step in the right direction and i think it's one that most of America is willing to recognize. legalization is not. once we can get America to see that it's not so dangerous then we can start talking about legalization, but that's not happening anytime soon. i'm glad kucinich is out there talking about his ideology because it's beautiful, but it's a beauty that a relatively small percentage of us recognize.

look MaiRead.... Pot shouldn't be illegal but it is not on the same level as CATNIP! Statements like yours push the pot-legalization movement back not 20 years, not 50 years, not 100 years, but for Christ sake a good 15,000 years!

I chose catnip because they look quite similar (being dried leaves) and catnip is to cats approximately as mj is to humans.

But substitute alcohol, if you prefer. Or tea. Or coffee. Or sugar (now THERE's a substance whose abuse causes major problems!). Or whatever you like.

The point is that mj is not illegal because of anything intrinsic to its nature, but because people with a hidden agenda chose to declare it to be illegal.

oh for christ sake.......

Oregano and catnip aren't listed as drugs because they don't DO anything to people!

IF you had initially said something like "the reason pot is a drug and not alcohol is because of racist anti-black and anti-hispanic drug policy and attitudes in the early 20th century," I would have said "BRAVO, absolutely correct!"

But instead you chose to make yourself (and the pot legalization movement) look like an idiot, by claiming that since pot's ilegal, oregano and catnip, and now TEA should be ilegal too.

The point is not what example I used, but that there are plenty of substances that are MORE harmful, even fatal, when misused that are in no danger of ever being made illegal. The criminalisation of mj was a racist and classist act, nothing more, and the idea that science plays ANY role at all beyond scapegoat cannot possibly be supported.

I'm on your side. I think the criminalization of pot is stupid, and its origin was based on lies and racism.

That doesn't however negate the fact that pot is a drug, and can be detrimental to users who need to operate stuff like cars, much in the same way as alcohol. Pot doesn't make users beligerant like alcohol, so IMHO, it's a great deal safer. It should however be regulated much in the same way alcohol is: age restrictions and equipment use restrictions (ie, you can't drive, operate a forklift etc).

I still stand by my statements about oregano and catnip however. That analogy is bogus, and doesn't bring your point across at all.

I'm not debating the merits of marijuana legalization, I'm making a statement. The issue is NOT the legal status of recreational marijuana use. It's about the use of marijuana as part of a MEDICAL treatment program.

Gov. Dean has stated that he's not inclined to support the use of an illegal drug as a medical treatment without an FDA study that proves that it is better than currently available, legal treatments. I may think that crack is a great cure for the chicken pox. Wouldn't you say it was silly to endorse the use of crack as a medical treatment without proving that crack was the best available substance?

Again, this has NOTHING to do with the legalization of recreational marijuana use. That's another issue entirely (which I don't think has anything to do with racism, by the way).

I posted a pointer to a medical-mj literature survey that includes about 600 citations to peer-reviewed medical literature. Claiming, as Dean did, that there isn't enough science is totally without foundation in fact. There is MUCH more understanding of mj today than there was of aspirin until a few years ago, yet aspirin was the most-prescribed drug EVEN THOUGH aspirin was known to be a substance that can be fatally abused and mj is known not to be.


Unless you want to postulate that mj was made illegal as a random, motiveless act, then the only thing that makes sense is racism. Under the influence of democratisation and the collapse of class barriers secondary to the Depression, it had started to make its way from the Black and Brown communities into the White. So, to stop that, a mythology was created ('Reefer Madness') to support the criminalisation of its use. This was in the '30s, a period during which 'left' and 'right' forces were in strong conflict, and criminalisation of mj was a weapon in that conflict (as were other laws prohibiting 'race mixing' of one kind or another).

1) Dean said that he would be in favor of the use of medical marijuana if an FDA-conducted study affirmed it to be e better treatment than current, legal treatments. He further said he'd commission such a study. If it's such a foregone conclusion that marijuana is a great medical tool, it should be approved for medical use within the next few years.

2) I'm not saying that marijuana was made illegal "as a random, motiveless act". It is a drug (well, THC is) which has behavior-altering properties and does NOT have a strong lobby. Alcohol also has harmful properties, but it has a strong lobby behind it. From a purely "medical" position, we should probably ban alcohol sales before we legalize marijuana. My point is that marijuana, like opiates and the rest (including alcohol), IS a "mind-altering" substance and DOES have health consequences. Alcohol has been (wrongly, from a purely practical standpoint) treated differently, but that doesn't serve as an arguement for the legalization of marijuana or any other drug.

3) The "Reefer Madness" strategy was meant to address the percieved moral decay of the time (allegedly perpetrated by the younger generation). The target of choice was marijuana; not because of any racial issue, but because it was seeing increased use by young people as a recreational drug.

Were there racial issues being addressed in this country at the same time? Of course. That does NOT make marijuana's legal status a racial issue.

It CERTAINLY does NOT mean that having reservations about supporting the use of MEDICAL marijuana makes you a racist.

He was being a drug warrior politician, not a scientist.

He is a doctor, and taught to be a skeptic.

I suspect any commission he would appoint would be window treatment synthesixing the existing literature and recomending 1) the use of pot as a pain reliever prescribed by physicians and 2) the redesignation of pot as anything but a schedule 1 narcotic, and possibly even complete decriminalization and regulation like alcohol or tobacco.

but who would have done that?

but just go unsubscribe like I did when I started receiving stuff from Kerry's campaign.

His courage and integrity saved Cleveland voters a documented $200M to date, and it can only get better.

They said it was a mistake, but that they would fix it. Something to do with some company they employed.

"fucking" spam.....Kucinich is a crybaby whinner because he is a looser....He screams at the debates and he can't sing a lick...He throws tantrums because he don't get no satisfaction...ever....

Actually I heard he was good in Baltimore last night. A loser wow I guess working hard to put yourself through college is real loserly, btw I for the record got some spam, doesnt bother me but it is the truth.

to the month old misleading flame bait article.

loser
I tell you, I get mad as any of y'all do but you know I try to keep it in. Sorry if I overreacted but I dont find my candiate to be a loser even if that someone really doesnt mean it. I am not gonna say your candiate sucks or youre wrong to support so and so.

I was getting it from Kerry and Kucinich almost every day. I only am signed up for Graham and Dean.

You know what you should do???

Cut-and-paste as much negative stuff from other websites and never write a single word of your own. Then start flame threads with that stuff. That'd show 'em!

But what's the point when you're not looking at the information.... only whether it's for or against the person you've already decided on.

And yes, I've already decided as well. If you could prove me wrong I'd listen.

Facts is Facts.
You percieve them to be negative because you WON'T accept them. They do not support your agenda. Refute my findings with your own. Counter the evidence if you can. But you can't; so you lash out at the messenger.

but your "fact" is months old news that was corrected almost instantly by the campaign.

EXAMPLE:

NEWS FLASH!!!!!

Dennis Kucinich has a goofy haircut!

Woops, I guess that's old news since he's decided to comb his hair like a grown up now, and has been for several months.....

So do you understand the concept of "old news" now?

I got stuff from the Republicans!

Actually, I got invited to the "president's dinner" two years running, and I would attend and make a protesting ass of myself, if I didn't have to pay $1,500 just to sit in there....

And I have no idea how Kerry got my email. It's not something I give to just anyone. Although I did use it to ask a few questions of Mr. Dean a while ago. I wonder if that's where Kerry got it?

Wow! I've known people who unsubscribed from Kucinich's list and it never took three days. No accusation meant, I'm just surprised, although they have been working on the website and increasing staff lately, so maybe your unsubscribe got over-looked in the chaos.

is asked to forward info to at least two friends. Info sent to an old addy would seem to support that theory of a long lost acquaintance who happens to be a Dean supporter, forwarding information. I'm sure Howard himself isn't sitting in front of his computer spamming the heck out of everybody. I've chosen not to forward Dean info, some other people do. I'm sure ther are people getting stuff from Dennis that don't have a clue where it came from as well. Why can't we all just get along? Dennis, Howard, John, Wesley etal.......one of these people are going to need our utmost support in the coming year. Let's act like adults and though promote our choice, be civil in the process. Honestly, it seems like I'm back in high school on this board at times.

“WE RECENTLY CONTRACTED with two vendors who made assurances that their lists were opt-in only,” the campaign said in an e-mail to CNET News.com. “On Tuesday, August 12th, Dean for America received notification from a supporter that spam was being sent. We terminated our relationship with both vendors immediately.”
http://www.msnbc.com/news/954100.asp?0cv=CB20

Problem has already been fixed.

It's amazing what a little information can do to a (discussion, converstion, debate) The problems solved.

I'm thinking of adding his name to a spam filter.

You have no love for the man and no need to get his fundraising emails.

I have signed up for reports from the Dean campaign and only receive two or three emails a month.

I signed up AND give money on line. I'm not overwhelmed with e-mail

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I've been givingfor months, and rarely get e-mail.

Something is not right with these stories......

but I did receive Nico Pitney's article for some odd reason. I agree :) Go Dennis Go.

You never get any new material, and the material you have was never funny in the first place...

Speaking of spam... do you ever post anything substantive?

But lets face it... Dean is totally wrong on health care.

America needs SINGLE PAYER health coverage, not the band-aid Dean proposes.

nuff said!

I laughed and I'd have laughed regardless of what the "caption" for it was.

I do have to ask WTF are you (generic you to the people claiming to have been spammed) people doing to get all this unwanted mail?! Jeez, I'm signed on with all sorts of Democratic organizations, Kucinich's campaign, plus about 8 million list-serves and I don't get anything from anyone BUT the Kucinich campaign in my e-mail. I've visited just about every candidates sites now, but only signed on with Kucinich. Just wierd!