|
Edited on Sun Nov-23-03 04:05 PM by George_Bonanza
Where somebody sticks their privates into, whether it be a vagina or an anus, is really pointless IMHO. Nobody gets hurt, nobody loses money, etc. So what's really the point? There are a lot more repulsive sexual acts out there, such as dog-screwing, than homosexual activity which is simply anal sex that a lot of straight couples practise as well. For Bush to be re-elected, which equals more deaths abroad and jobs lost at home, on the crux of where a dick is stuck and where it's not, seems very trivial. I know some religious people, ranging from Judeo-Christians to Eastern faiths, have a problem with gays because God (s) meant for a man and a woman to be together. Fine, go ahead, I can't convince you otherwise. But surely they must value human life before sex. They should know that Bush will only cause further death in Iraq, a country that absolutely loathes him. Human lives or sex? Which one do you choose? The answer seems so obvious to me. It's like "I know George W. will keep our soldiers out to dry (meaning die) in the desert, but I approve of him because he and I agree on sex." It's just the age-old preoccupation with sex over more important things, like life and peace.
|