Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New campaign law gives wealthy last-minute voice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:13 AM
Original message
New campaign law gives wealthy last-minute voice
WASHINGTON (AP) - Though companies and unions are now banned from financing last-minute election ads, wealthy individuals already are writing big checks that will give them a voice on the airwaves in the final days before voters pick candidates.

An exemption in the nation's campaign finance law allows well-heeled people to give unlimited amounts to certain tax-exempt, unincorporated groups to pay for TV and radio ads targeting candidates just before elections.

The option is so attractive that some traditional political groups, such as the GOP-leaning Club for Growth, are considering shedding their incorporated status to qualify for the right to influence elections with big-dollar ads down the stretch.

"I'm sure if and when that ever happens it will drive all the campaign finance reformers batty. But it clearly is allowed by the law," said David Keating, executive director of the Club for Growth.

more: http://www.theunionleader.com/prez_show.html?article=29990
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.
Thanks for posting that.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioStateProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. well
to look at this positively, many Hollywood types, and Ben and Jerry's could now Finance some TV ads for Kucinich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's no way to avoid that. (And all the BIG $s have been for us)
There would be no possible way for a law to pass Constitutional muster if it said and individual couldn't spend his/her own money to say something about a political issue.

You can keep them from giving the money to a candidate or party, you can keep them from "coordinating" the expenditure with the candidate or party (though I have no idea how you enforce that). But you can't keep Soros from spending five million dollars the day before the election to say "I don't like Bush".


What's the point of free speech if I can't say "don't vote for 'x'"???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC