Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Real Was the Prosperity?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:05 AM
Original message
How Real Was the Prosperity?
We're just beginning to figure out how much of the nation's recent growth was the result of a credit-induced frenzy. Here are some guideposts

Mark it down. Clear the slate. Get it all behind us. That's what the big banks are trying to do now. With their massive write-offs, Citigroup (C), Merrill Lynch (MER), and the other big financial institutions hope to take all of their pain at once. In toto, Wall Street firms have taken roughly $100 billion in losses on their investments.

...

But the underlying problems that ail the markets and the economy cannot be waved away by the Fed's magic wand. In truth, we're at the beginning of a long, arduous process of figuring out how much of the post-tech bubble prosperity was real and how much was the result of a credit-induced frenzy.

...

Way Beyond Housing

The housing markets, of course, overshot as too many buyers took out subprime mortgages they couldn't afford. The outcome will be a decline in home values, with prices in some areas already down.

But the economic writedown is likely to go far beyond housing. Household spending, consumer debt, financial sector profits: All may need a retrenchment, sudden or gradual, to get back to sustainable levels.

There may even be a reassessment of whether recent productivity gains were fueled by excess credit.

...

There's no way to tell yet how much of the gains of recent years will have to be written down—how much we will have to reduce our expectations for the future.

...

Some of those apparent productivity gains also may be illusory. If the economy was artificially boosted by excess borrowing, that would show up as higher output and, presumably, higher productivity. The implication is that once borrowing recedes to the historical average, actual underlying productivity growth might be lower than we thought.

The outcome won't become clear for a while. But if productivity growth is slower, then the economy's "speed limit" —the maximum growth rate that doesn't push up inflation— would be lower. Presumably, a slower-growing, less productive U.S. would become less attractive to foreign investors.

...

These are sobering questions to consider. One consolation: The American economy can produce pleasant as well as nasty surprises. Many foresaw the tech bubble of the 1990s bursting; few predicted the housing boom that followed. Maybe a new force will emerge to propel the economy forward and keep spending robust. Right now, that's what everyone wants to know.

Business Week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. There could be an alternative energy boom, if the government would get behind it
Give person fish, they eat for a day. Teach them to fish, they eat for life. It's always better to support something sustainable, like alternative energy solutions, than it is to, say, send someone 300 bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree...
.. but Congress would rather spend all its time handing out temporary payday loans and arguing about drilling for tiny pockets of oil in Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Agree. Allowing individuals to have sustainable wages ...
is what they preach but not practice. What they call foolish 'consumer spending' is actually fleecing of Americans, which leaves them without discretionary income. The subprime mess is the best example in recent memory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. All bubble prosperity is illusory.
This bubble was not much different, in that respect, from the overhyped tech bubble of the Clinton era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC