Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List: The world’s best inventions weren’t made for profit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Edward-M Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:13 PM
Original message
List: The world’s best inventions weren’t made for profit.
1. The internet. (The government & Tim Berners-Lee.)

2. Penicillin. “Florey believed it would be inappropriate to patent penicillin, but learned his lesson when some of his American collaborators did just that… Florey took no profit for himself.”
http://time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,33700,00.html

3. AC power & modern electricity. (Tesla)
“Yet Tesla died destitute.”
http://inventors.about.com/od/tstartinventions/a/Nikola_Tesla.htm

4. Phone. “Meucci was recognized as the first inventor of the telephone by the US House.” “ was unable to raise sufficient funds to pay for the patent application… In 1861 his cottage was auctioned.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Meucci

5. Lightbulb. “Göbel the first practical bulb… in 1854, a quarter of a century before Edison’s patent.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_G%C3%B6bel

Yes he died pennyless too.

6. Radio. “Tesla is now credited with inventing modern radio as well; since the Supreme Court overturned Marconi’s patent in 1943 in favor of Tesla’s earlier patents.”
http://inventors.about.com/od/tstartinventions/a/Nikola_Tesla.htm

7. Almost everything else - through state funding of science & university research.

The point? While we all love for-profit economics, let’s not exaggerate their role either. At best they tend to succeed after government acceleration of new technologies.


from
http://newsrogue.com/list-the-worlds-best-inventions-werent-made-for-profit/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. interesting. I think more and more univ. research is linked
to corporations providing funding, or toward the goal of starting a spinoff company including the professors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
N4457S Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. And This...
...is basically what the economy of northern California is built on: public and private partnerships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. After the government puts up the money, the corporations join the partnership. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. corporations are the least efficient mechanism for any kind of creativity
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:13 PM by leftofthedial
laissez faire capitalism--and the corporatocracy it has spawned--has nearly eliminated innovation


our culture repackages and re-brands endlessly; always chooses the safe, proven and conventional; and stifles any sign of creative thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Many corporations stifle creativity and new products to prevent competition.
Texas Instruments and Intel were started by engineers whose employers wouldn't allow them to work on new technology. Back in the 1950's, Univac corporation was ahead of IBM in computer development. However, the company's "genius" CEO cut research because "computers were so expensive, there was no sustainable market for them".

The GUI (Graphical User Interface) such as Windows, the mouse, object-oriented programming, and other computer innovations were invented back in the 1970's at Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center). Because the hardware necessary to run it at that time cost about $20,000, the "genius" executives at Xerox cancelled the program since few people could afford to pay that much money for a computer.

Of course, in the early 1980's, hardware costs began dropping. Apple came out with the technology in the Macintosh, and a few years later, Microsoft adopted the technology. To my knowledge, Xerox is no longer in the computer business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. We should also
add all the advancements that came about from the space program (like the silicon chip) that was all public funds and done for no profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. the web?
how about the Salk polio vaccine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Computer development was funded by the government (military and NASA). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. nothing is more destructive of the creative spirit
or more antithetical to the progress of our species

than is capitalism and the "profit motive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC