Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From Peak Oil to Dark Age? (BusinessWeek)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 03:13 AM
Original message
From Peak Oil to Dark Age? (BusinessWeek)
From Eugene Linden, author of The Winds of Change: Climate, Weather, and the Destruction of Civilizations.

From Peak Oil to Dark Age?
Oil output has stalled, and it's not clear the capacity exists to raise production


With global oil production virtually stalled in recent years, controversial predictions that the world is fast approaching maximum petroleum output are looking a bit less controversial. At first blush, those concerned about global warming should be delighted. After all, what better way to prod the move toward carbon-free, climate-friendly alternative energy?

But climate change activists have nothing to cheer about. The U.S. is completely unprepared for peak oil, as it's called, and the wrenching adjustments it would entail could easily accelerate global warming as nations turn to coal (see BusinessWeek.com, 4/19/07, "Rx for Earth: Sooner Not Later"). Moreover, regardless of the implications for climate change, peak oil represents a mortal threat to the U.S. economy.

...

The reality is that it will be here much sooner for the U.S.—in the form of peak oil exports. Since we import nearly two-thirds of the oil we consume, global oil available for export should be our bigger concern. Fast-growing domestic consumption in oil-exporting nations and increasing appetites by big importers such as China portend tighter supplies available to the U.S., unless world production rises rapidly. But output has stalled. Call it de facto peak oil or peak oil lite. It means the U.S. is entering an age when it will have to scramble to maintain existing import levels.

We will know soon enough whether the capacity to raise production really exists. If not, basic math and the clock tell the story. All alternatives—geothermal, solar, wind, etc.—produce only 3% of the energy supplied by oil. If oil demand rises by 2% while output remains flat, generation of alternative energy would have to expand 60% a year. That's more than twice the rate of wind power, the fastest-growing alternative energy. And all this incremental energy would somehow have to be delivered to transportation (which consumes most of the oil produced each year) just to stay even with the growth in demand.

An editorial. But recommended.

Oh, baby, recommended.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. We don't have an energy crisis, the real problems are mostly environmental
There is a large supply of oil and gas and coal, to take us far into the future if we use it.
There is no danger of shortages anytime soon, nor of high production cost.
High prices are political, not based on production cost. With high prices, those elites who control the supply are
getting hugely rich.

The real problem with the current high use of these fuels is environmental. Global warming and global mercury pollution and other emissions are major problems.

But distribution and usage patterns are a problem for the U.S. and some other countries. The extremely high and wasteful use patterns in the U.S. combined with production declines in the U.S. have led to high import levels, resulting in huge balance of payments debt and transfer of U.S. economic assets to other countries over time. There has been a major transfer of economic assets and wealth away from the U.S. to other parts of the world over the last 30 years, since Jimmy Carter declared a major crisis (the moral equivalent of war). Unfortunately not many took him seriously.

There is a huge amount of cost effective measures that are available to reduce the high and wasteful energy use in the U.S. While also increasing economic well being. There just isn't sufficient desire to do it. Those who control the system are doing well the way things are.
The majority will increasingly suffer, but haven't to date made enough effort to make needed changes in leadership and direction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC