Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant's Cooling Tower Collapses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:02 PM
Original message
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant's Cooling Tower Collapses
Edited on Fri Aug-31-07 12:14 PM by garybeck
Just one more example of why nuclear power is dangerous. From uranium mining to the dangers of energy production to the delimma of storing the waste, nuclear power is a bad idea.

------------

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials want explanations about why and how part of a Vermont Yankee cooling tower collapsed earlier this week.
Vermont Public Radio

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials want explanations about why and how part of a Vermont Yankee cooling tower collapsed earlier this week.

Plant executives say they're trying to answer questions themselves.

Nuclear power opponents are distributed emails with photographs that they say show the damage at the Vernon plant.

The pictures show a 50-foot tall section of wall that's made of large plastic and fiberglass louvers. It's collapsed onto a fence and water gushes from a ruptured pipe high up in the structure.

(Sheehan) "The photos are pretty dramatic. There's no question about that."

Neal Sheehan of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says the photos show the complete collapse of what's known as a "cell" in one of the two cooling towers at Vermont Yankee.


..snip..

The Vermont Public Interest Research Group calls the failure "breathtaking." James Moore works on energy issues for V-PIRG.

(Moore) "This incident calls into question all of the claims that Entergy Nuclear has made about the plant's clean bill of health and that it's operating like new."

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/vpr/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1136248
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. No radioactivity released...don't worry...just move along, nothing to see here...
No one would ever defer, fudge, or otherwise screw up maintenance on any part of a nuclear plant that actually mattered, you know. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, did this story even register a blip on the national media radar?
The only place I heard anything about this at all was VPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That's because it's a non-story, despite what some people are trying to make it out to be.
A framework which supported hot water release pipes collapsed. That's hardly a nuclear accident, nor is it a "cooling tower" in the way that people typically think of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Right, it's a sign that nuclear power plants in private hands are being well maintained -- !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazyriver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The only place I heard about it was your post and
I live in Maine!

It's unbelievable there was nothing on MPBN or any of our local papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. The link to the MP3 does not work for me, is there a YouTube version
....or realplayer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think VPR puts their reports on YouTube
the audio works for me. did you try right-click and then download the mp3 file, and then listen to it? Sometimes that works better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maintenance and oversight of nuclear power plants has been too little, too late ---
and even after serious lack of maintenance is made clear, the problem is downplayed and repairs are slow and insufficient.

We have 106 nuclear plants in the US -- and it takes 6 months to properly shut down a nuclear plant.

The fact that the "alleged" hijackers flew over a nuclear power plant on their way to attack the WTC towers -- Indian Point in Buchanan, NY -- raises alarming questions about what might have been.

Despite the public opposition to nuclear power plants, I think the GOP has succeeded in planning to add more????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Somewhat odd that this didn't come in via a news agency to Yahoo???? Or not????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. as they say, there's no story here.... move along.... look the other way... in other news,
Brittney Spears got a haircut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. FOLLOWUP - Vermont Yankee automatically shuts down for unknown reason - 8/31
Vermont Yankee says plant is safe and stable after shutdown
John Dillon


VERNON, VT (2007-08-31)

Vermont Yankee spokesman Rob Williams says the shutdown happened during a routine testing of a steam valve. He says it's not clear why the plant automatically shut down.

(Williams) "We have our plant technicians and engineers looking into that. The plant remains in a safe and stable condition and will restart only after a thorough evaluation of the shutdown is completed."

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/vpr/news.newsmain?action=article&ARTICLE_ID=1140100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. "Not clear why the plant automatically shut down" . . . . but no problem -- !!!! ??? !!!!
Does it remind you of dialogue from "China Syndrome" -- ?

In fact, it just played the other night and I watched some of it --

Prophesy -- ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It was due to a steam valve sticking. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Let's hope so . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Um...gee...well...uh...hmmm
Edited on Fri Aug-31-07 08:24 PM by NNadir
I'll bet you couldn't care less about cooling towers at a single coal plant.

This is at the level of the "dangerous nuclear earthquake" in Japan.

The mumber of injuries is zero. 181 people could die in a dangerous coal mine collapse, and the world couldn't care less.

How do I know.

There is not ONE, not ONE anti-nuke who has called for the banning of dangerous coal mining with many hundreds of deaths areound the world because of collapses.

There is not ONE, not ONE anti-nuke who gives a rat's ass about the 500,000 Chinese who will die from air pollution.

There is not ONE, not ONE anti-nuke who understands the second law of thermodynamics...

How do we know?

There is not ONE, not ONE anti-nuke who has ever bothered to look at the cooling towers at the DRAX coal station in Britain and not ONE with the guts to call for shutting this coal station because it has cooling towers.

Here they are:



Unlike this Vermont hysteria, the coal plant will kill huge numbers of people during normal operations. There is not ONE anti-nuke who could care less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. The usual fine quality control we have come to expect from our nuclear boys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC