Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Corn is King of Biofuels, Tropical Maize May Be Emperor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 09:09 AM
Original message
If Corn is King of Biofuels, Tropical Maize May Be Emperor
http://www.renewableaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=50329

When University of Illinois crop scientist Fred Below began growing tropical maize, the form of corn grown in the tropics, he was looking for novel genes for the utilization of nitrogen fertilizer and was hoping to discover information that could be useful to American corn producers.

<snip>

Early research results show that tropical maize, when grown in the Midwest, requires few crop inputs such as nitrogen fertilizer, chiefly because it does not produce any ears. It also is easier for farmers to integrate into their current operations than some other dedicated energy crops because it can be easily rotated with corn or soybeans, and can be planted, cultivated and harvested with the same equipment U.S. farmers already have.

<snip>

What it does produce, straight from the field with no processing, is 25 percent or more sugar—mostly sucrose, fructose and glucose.

"Corn is a short-day plant, so when we grow tropical maize here in the Midwest the long summer days delay flowering, which causes the plant to grow very tall and produce few or no ears," says Below. Without ears, these plants concentrate sugars in their stalks, he adds. Those sugars could have a dramatic affect on Midwestern production of ethanol and other biofuels.

<more>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlecBGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. COOL!
thanks for posting :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. celulose will be the grand poobah. ;) lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Corn is the queen of biofuels...
...the welfare queen. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. If all the corn in the world was converted to ethanol, we would address 9% of our energy needs
Edited on Sat Oct-27-07 07:58 AM by tom_paine
Further, corn biofuels drastically deplete the soil because they take the "residue" and turn it into ethanol, also (they have to, because corn ethanol produces a relatively low energy-out/energy-in ration).

The "residue" is the root system normally left in the soil by farmers to replienish it with nutrients.

Ethanol is a giant Archer Daniels Midland Boondoggle which will make Bushies' trillions of $$$s while addressing not one thing that is a genuine problem.

Sorry to throw water on everyone, but it's better to realize this now before we waste all this time and money and arable land, that we are soon going to need for FOOD, in this boondoggle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I thought that the residue was the stalks, not the roots.
I haven't seen the farm equipment used to pull the corn plant out by the roots.

Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I could be mistaken. I don't have a link, but there's half a chance hatrack
posted it here. It is likely I read it here, but it was a couple months ago, so it may be archived.

Even if that is the case, one thing I am certain about is that residues (whatever they may be) are supposed to be left to decay back into the soil to re-nutrify.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-27-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree with you on the disposition of the residues.
Frankly, I think that we should be composting everything that will compost and is not contaminated to improve soil quality and substitute for commercial fertilizers.

I read an EPA warming paper a few years ago that said that soil with a high hummus content holds water much better, and will sustain crops through a drought better than soils that are depleted. The EPA suggested that farmers, especially in the grain-growing states, start immediately to improve their soil. Somehow, I don't think that's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC