Discredited ‘TV Weatherman’

I see this guy on TV from time to time.
He is local (San Diego KUSI).
And he is LOCO!

---

Right Wing Trumpets Global Warming Denial Of Discredited ‘TV Weatherman’



Yesterday, John Coleman, a founder of The Weather Channel, wrote an article for the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, a right-wing climate change skeptic site, claiming man-made global warming is just a “scam“:

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in allusion of rapid global warming.

As proof that the scientific consensus is a hoax, Coleman writes:

I say this knowing you probably won’t believe a me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. … I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct.

MORE: http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/08/coleman-weather/

---

He even looks like a putz.

Putz.

MKJ

Eureka...no one else has thought about it!

What an ass.

Always kind of enjoyed his forecasts as a kid. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, John, on the retirement cruise to obscurity...

If anybody knows about climate, climate change, atmospheric physics, advanced computer modeling, heat sinks, and greenhouse gases, it's a really old fucker with a lot of money.

You people need to get a clue.

Comment on ThinkProgress:

"can see it now: Jack Coleman & Rupert Murdoch combine forces to create…

FOX WEATHER CHANNEL

Where it’s always 76 degrees with only a 20% chance of precipitation…because they say it is. And they know they’re right."

:rofl:

he knows more about it than the majority of the scientific community?

:evilgrin:

because the Weather Channel, believes in global warming, they have all kinds of shows about it.

For them, it's a great moment for "See? Told ya so!". Accompanied, of course, by lots of screaming and throwing chunks of dung.

This looks like freeper-spelling and syntax. It's hard to believe it's from an edited article.

Allusion has a completely different meaning. Spell check isn't perfect. In cases such as this, only a literate human being will do.

and talked to some scientists. Shit man, I've eaten dozens of doughnuts and talked to a couple of cops and I know all about crime control now.

This guy is even dumber than Faux news.

that is all

yup, got that right.