Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the future for solar energy really so bright?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 10:43 PM
Original message
Is the future for solar energy really so bright?
Edited on Mon Nov-19-07 10:44 PM by OKIsItJustMe
Solar stocks may be trading too high.
...

According to Sarasin, global solar cell production jumped from 1.7 gigawatts to 2.5 gigawatts in 2006 as a bottleneck in the manufacture of solar-grade silicon cleared. That's good news for consumers and policy-makers but less exciting for the producers of silicon, wafers, cells and modules - which is almost every quoted solar company. Fat margins, which together with growth expectations have fuelled nose-bleed share prices, look set to tumble.

...


Somehow, I'm not disappointed...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/11/20/ccinv120.xml

Is the future for solar energy really so bright?

By Tom Stevenson
Last Updated: 1:37am GMT 20/11/2007

It is hard to imagine a healthier backdrop for alternative energy companies than that provided by today's nervous times. The oil price has $100 in its sights, politicians are engaged in a greener-than-thou race to the environmental high ground and energy security is right at the top of policy-makers' agendas as geopolitical tensions continue to simmer.

Here in Britain, and with half an eye on David Cameron's ostentatious greening, Gordon Brown has been persuaded that early action on climate change is imperative. Britain's renewable energy targets, demanding as they are, now look like being just the starting point. Similar voter-led policy developments are happening worldwide.

It is hardly surprising then that a new report from Swiss private bank Sarasin should present such a bullish view of the outlook for growth in the global solar energy industry. Photo-voltaic cell production rose 44pc last year, Sarasin says, and it forecasts 50pc a year growth for the rest of this decade and then a further 22pc a year until 2020.

Put that on a chart and the numbers for annual installations start to head pretty steeply up the page. The power of compounding means the size of the industry quickly becomes serious. The performance of the solar industry's publicly quoted companies - the main index of solar stocks has doubled so far this year - looks understandable, if dizzying.

Matthias Fawer, the author of Solar Energy 2007 - The Industry Continues to Boom, which is published today, believes growth in the industry might be close to a tipping point. Dramatic reductions in costs, he says, will make solar power competitive with conventional forms of electricity or heat within 10 years.

The industry is currently fuelled almost wholly by government subsidies, but once the big power generators see "grid parity", solar bulls argue, the economics change completely.

Currently, solar is two to three times too expensive to be competitive, says Bruce Jenkyn-Jones at environmental investor Impax, compared with a few percentage points for rival technologies like wind. But developments in areas such as thin-film technology are rapidly bringing costs down. Solar's time may really have come.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't it pretty much depend on where one lives? Arizona - YES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-20-07 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's what we need.....a tipping point for Solar (and Wind)
and geo-thermal, etc.


But.....is 10 years too late for the planet.


Think of today's tiny cell phones that are very inexpensive. I remember the shoe-box sized, horribly expensive, early cell phones. (Remember the huge cellphone Michael Douglas used on the beach in the 1987 movie "Wall Street?") It took what? Twenty years to get from there to here? Solar is moving even more slowly, but I think that's because there was no big money behind it to push it in the beginning, and it isn't enough of a status symbol to catch on with the early adopters, who always pay too much for emerging technologies, and help finance their development.

I hope soon we'll all be generating our own electricity, and also plugging in our cars at night to power our daily commute with solar or wind.

I also hope more of us don't commute at all. I was talking with my boss, and he said the business world is slowly coming around to the idea of telecommuting, and as the "old school types" leave the work-force, there will be more telecommuting. Think of how much oil that would save! And think how much less we'd have to spend on roads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC