Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toshiba micro-reactor a "hoax"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 04:51 PM
Original message
Toshiba micro-reactor a "hoax"
You might remember this story from last month:
"(xpost) Toshiba Builds 100x Smaller Micro Nuclear Reactor"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=126211

According to Rod Adams, it's a hoax:
I have made contact with some good sources within Toshiba to confirm that the original story posted on nextenergynews.com did not originate with them. According to Toshiba, the project that they consider to be a super-small reactor is the 4S (Super-safe small and simple) design. The company initiated the process for preliminary review of that design in 2007 with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and believes that the system may be ready for commercialization sometime in the "mid 2010s".

The company confirmed my guess that the 200 kwe number in the hoax article is based a JAERI concept design for a lunar application. The "news" article from nextenergy news merged two very different projects and used a sketch associated with the 4S and called it a logo for the "new" device. Bottom line - Toshiba is not introducing an apartment sized machine and does not have any plans for a small reactor to be in operation for quite a few years.

http://atomicinsights.blogspot.com/2008/01/update-posted-on-toshiba-micro-reactor.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That certainly addresses...
...the safety concerns that a number of people mentioned when that first article went live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. That didn't make sense
:dunce:

:tinfoilhat:

Why would they do it, and why didn't it get treatment from reliable services such as the AP?

I'm glad that's been cleared up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just like the NJ charlatan molten salt breeder reactor that will bring "fabulous riches"
*poof*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Um, um, um, um...
You're very, very, very, very, very, very big on stating that "nuclear power is dead."

I think your cult has been saying as much for 37 years.

From the Pope of anti-nukes:

Our thesis rests on a different perception. Our attempt to rethink focuses not on marginal reforms but on basic assumptions. In fact, the global nuclear power enterprise is rapidly disappearing. De facto moratoria on reactor ordering exist today in the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, Ireland, and probably the United Kingdom, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan and Canada. Nuclear power has been indefinitely deferred or abandoned in Austria, Denmark, Norway, Iran, China, Australia and New Zealand. Nuclear power elsewhere is in grave difficulties. Only in centrally planned economies, notably France and the U.S.S.R., is bureaucratic power sufficient to override, if not overcome, economic facts.


Amory Lovins, Hunter Lovins, Leonard Ross "Nuclear Power and Nuclear Bombs," Foreign Affairs, pg 1138, Summer, 1980.

Hallucinate much, Amory?

I have heard fundementalist anti-nukes saying here that "nuclear power is dead" for quite sometime, but my impression is that they've been eating home grown hallucinogenic mushrooms with Mom at the family compound.

Meanwhile on planet earth: http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table27.xls

No amount of scientific fact, no number of numbers, no measurement can dissuade a fundie from being a fundie.

In fact, the anti-nuke fundies, isolated in their little yuppie brat car culture enclaves seem to be shuffling a little bit.

The whole anti-nuke cult is looking more and more and more and more hallucinatory.

Later on we'll talk about how the two authors of the cult scripture, Hunter and Amory, got married in a sweat lodge, exchanging knives in a little cult ritual.

It's a great story, and pretty illustrative of the nature of cult thinking.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The charlatan NJ molten salt breeder reactor was "made up"
Delusional sick fuck nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Um, um, um, um....
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 10:02 PM by NNadir
Really?

You find the Pope of the anti-nuke cults comments from 1976 and 1980 delusional?

So do I!

That is an improvement!

Why don't you cower under the Mom's dining room table (Duck! Here comes a cosmic ray), eat some more of those "home grown" mushrooms, smoke some more of that home grown stuff they grow in the clearcuts in the back woods, and announce that "nuclear power has gone away."

Let's have some more of the Walmart greenwasher's commentary from 1980 on the imminent death of nuclear power:


Nuclear power is not only too slow; it is the wrong kind of energy source to replace oil. Most governments have viewed the energy problem as simply how to supply more energy of any type, from any source, at any price, to replace oil—as if demand were homogeneous. In fact, there are many different types of energy whose different prices and qualities suit them to different uses. It is the uses that matter: people want comfort and light, not raw kilowatt-hours. Assuming (as we do) equal convenience and reliability to the user, the objective should be to supply the amount and type of energy that will do each task most cheaply.


Amory Lovins, "Nuclear Power and Nuclear Bombs," Summer 1980, Foreign Affairs pp 1139-1177

Meanwhile, on Planet Earth:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table27.xls

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table17.xls

Real quick that renewable business, eh Uncle Amory. Um...um...um...maybe you should stick to working at the photo counter at Walmart, no?

Then there's this gem:

As costs rise and credibility falls, the market for more electricity is quietly evaporating. With the inevitable response to higher prices beginning, forecasts of electricity demand growth in most countries have been falling steadily.


Meanwhile on Planet Earth, about 37 years after Uncle Amory said that electricity was going to go away:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/RecentTotalElectricGeneration.xls

Oh, congrats to all the fundies on the planet, anti-nuke and otherwise, for Huckabee's great showing in Iowa. The fundie set must be very proud.

And now, while you and mom hide under the table ducking cosmic rays and smoking home grown, I think I'll work on my diary on another site. Don't put the home grown down; the diary involves something called "numbers." You and Mom wouldn't get it anyway, and at this point, there doesn't seem to be much hope that you'll both stop hallucinating in any case.

Ignorance kills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Unlike the made-up NJ charlatan molten salt breeder reactor - solar molten salt techinology "exists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Really? In every backyard?
Just like Saint Amory predicted in 1976?

Who knew?

I'll check the EIA documents to see if molten solar toys have eliminated the electricl grid.

By the way, typical of anti-nukes who know very little about the technology they criticize, the idea that the molten salt nuclear reactor is "new" is about 50 years old, just like the rest of the hack stuff from the anti-nuke cult.

Alvin Weinberg operated the Molten Salt Reactor in the 1960's. It worked quite well, but was defunded, mostly because uranium was so cheap.

Now if you read the Gospel According to Amory - the fellow who said that electrical demand was going to go away because of all that solar stuff in everyone's backyard - you find that Amory quoted Weinberg in his hallucinatory paper on "The Road Not Taken."

In fact, the stuff he reproduced from Weinberg was the only stuff that wasn't as batshit crazy as the rest of the chants the fundie anti-nuke faith as been spouting since the Oracle at Snowmass delivered his gospel to the faithful.

Meanwhile back on planet earth, the MSR is included Gen IV program for the redevelopment. Apparently the planet is ignoring his Holiness' report that "nuclear power is dead."

In other news, John Paul II, apologized to Galileo, almost 400 years too late. Maybe one of the Greenpeace cult leaders in the 25th century - assuming that ignorance doesn't wipe out life on earth before then - will apologize to Weinberg. On the other hand, maybe Greenpeace will fade away long before nuclear power does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know this
The "made-up" Toshiba mini-reactor = HOAX

The "made-up" DU "Resident Expert" molten salt breeder reactor = HOAX

that is all you need to know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. For an claiming authority as an interpreter of hoaxes...
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 05:32 PM by NNadir
...you do seem to post a lot of canned Amory Lovins rhetoric.

I note with amusement (mixed with contempt) that you have not bothered to acknowledge one bit of the big decades old hoax from the Walmart executive whose blabber you uncritically reproduce day after day, year after year.

What a surprise!

We'll just add this judgement of yours about what is and is not a hoax to the big, big, big, big claims, punctuated by frequent "world's largest" statements, to the rest of the "solar will save us" junk.

Be sure to announce the decade in which you expect the perennial "solar revolution" to produce a single exajoule of energy.

Oh wait. I already know. It's "by 2050."

That will be roughly 75 years after Saint Amory first wrote his grand scripture on the appropriate form of worship for the sun god.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, did you or did you not invent a molten salt breeder reactor??
Edited on Fri Jan-04-08 05:46 PM by jpak
not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. You have no way of knowing, do you?
Edited on Sat Jan-05-08 01:57 AM by NNadir
It's not like you understand the chemistry of curium triiodide in molten strontium iodide. In fact, the number of fundies of any type - and that would include Mike Huckabee and Amory Lovins - who have any respect for any science, chemistry included, is zero.

There is absolutely zero evidence that you have ever considered the chemical extraction of Neptunium hexafluoride into NaF at 350C, because there is no evidence whatsoever that you know a damn thing about the chemistry of molten salts.

Your entire knowledge of molten salts in fact, consists of regurgitating Amory Lovins chants from 1976 about the solar molten salt storage tanks in "every backyard."

It's not like you and Mom are discussing the doppler broadening of the shoulder in the U-233 capture cross section resonance and 0.2 MeV while you're laying under the yuppie party table throwing up Allen's Coffee brandy.

It's not like your little gathering of the anti-nuke car culture cult stops smoking home grown long enough to discuss the effect of erbium-167 on the breeding ratio with respect to channel width in graphite.

In fact there's no evidence that you know anything about nuclear science at all, which is why you're against it, much like Patty Robertson is against geology while knowing nothing about the subject at all.

The fact is, cutie pie, is that you are against the world's largest form of climate change gas free energy - using existing technology - that would be the pressurized water reactor combined with the boiling water reactor.

The number of new types of reactors that are required to make nuclear power the largest form of climate change gas free energy is zero. Nuclear power has been, since 1980, the world's largest source of climate change gas free industrial energy.

Your entire shtick is rehashing 30 year old dogma from the moron paid (off) corporate hack Uncle Amory.

The anti-nuke fundie cult - when you scratch the surface - knows zero about nuclear science; zero about energy; and zero about critical thinking. It is, in fact, a cult that relies on ignorance for its existence, and IGNORANCE KILLS.

Now let's have a quote from Amory Lovins on the subject of Brandy, since apparently he is very, very, very, very popular with the drinking class of the remedial physics department.

Electricity is a special, high-quality, extremely expensive form of energy. This costly energy may be economically worth-while in such premium uses as motors, lights, smelters, railways and electronics, but no matter how efficiently it is used, it cannot come close to competing with present direct fuels...

...In most industrial countries, therefore, a third to a half of all electricity generated is already being used, uneconomically, for low-temperature heating and cooling. Additional electricity could only be so used. Arguing about what kind of new power station to build is thus like shopping for brandy to burn in the car or Chippendales to burn in the stove.


Amory Lovins, "baby-cakes-knife-cult-ceremony-Natural-Capitalist" Hunter Lovins, Leonard Ross, Foreign Affairs, Summer (1980) 1137-1177. The quoted citation from the 50 pages of insipid drivel can be found on pages 1151-1152.

So by the term "direct fuels" we see that Uncle Amory started his career as a fossil fuels apologist and has never deviated it from it, like just the rest of the anti-nuke fundie cult that ensures his fortune.

As for the brandy and the decline of the need for electricity, back on Planet Earth...

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/table62.xls



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I are a nucular engineer!
I are a auto-didactical nucular engineer!
I invented the Morton Salt Breeder Reactor!
Morton Salt is better because it is Iodized!
Downwinders do not have to take Iodine Tablets,
because Iodine is already in the fallout!
Remember...when it rains, it pours...Mortons!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. LOL!
But it really is pathetic that so many here at DU were taken in by this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. This post fully and totally expresses the level of knowledge of the anti-nuke cult.
There is NOT ONE fundie anti-nuke who takes the matter of destroying the world's largest, by far, form of climate change more seriously than can be expressed in a lazy reproduction of graphics.

IGNORNANCE KILLS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Please - tell us that Fairy Tale again
You know, the one where you contaminated your thyroid with 125I and "controlled" it with table salt...

That was a good one...

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. After you tell us, all about the capture cross section of sodium chloride
I'll be happy to discuss iodine.

The fact that the other little anti-nuke fundie here produced a marketing blurb for sodium chloride demonstrates fully and completely that the anti-nuke cult, which can no more be dissauded from dogma than Huckabee (congrats on the win, big boy) can be dissauded by something called molecular biology

Then maybe you can tell us how on the boy's "we all want to write something about our yuppie trip to Antarctica in our high school application essay" high school class trip, Mom let you play with an RIA kit, making you into an expert on flux flattening in the core of bismuth reactors.

In fact, you are entirely ignorant of nuclear technology, and all the insipid giggling in the world will not change then.

Duck, there goes a "beta ray."

Jump under the table! Avoid the vomited Allen's Coffee Brandy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Relativistic or thermal???
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Can I have some of that popcorn?
:popcorn:
This fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-04-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Equating opposition to nuclear power with religion is getting
awfully tiresome. Why don't you go back to the illiteracy meme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Really? Like Amory Lovin's backyard molten salt solar plants?
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 05:48 PM by NNadir
Oh well.

It's sort of like the anti-nuke fundie's "nuclear power is dead" hoax.

Most anti-nukes have very, very, very, very selective criteria for attention to "hoaxes."

Directly storing sunlight or wind—or, for that matter, electricity
from any source— is indeed difficult on a large scale. But it is easy if
done on a scale and in an energy quality matched to most end-use
needs. Daily, even seasonal, storage of low- and medium-temperature
heat at the point of use is straightforward with water tanks, rock beds,
or perhaps fusible salts. Neighborhood heat storage is even cheaper.
In industry, wind-generated compressed air can easily (and, with due
care, safely) be stored to operate machinery: the technology is simple,
cheap, reliable and highly developed.


-Amory Lovins, "The Road Not Taken, <em>Foreign Affairs</em> pg 83, October 1976.

Um Amory? Can we buy one at Walmart?

The number of new types of nuclear reactors required to make nuclear power the world's largest, by far, source of climate change gas free energy: Zero.

The number of back yard fusible salt solar toys to make solar energy get to one exajoule:

Several million.

Of course, the fact that Amory Lovins has always been a paid (off) hoax has not effected a single anti-nuke a whit. They are still in a cult that is trying to destroy the world's largest climate change gas free form of energy because, well, they are dolts.

Rod has some very, very, very, very enlightening comments on Uncle Amory, by the way.

No one could suffer from reading Rod's writings, of course, but I rather think that the members of the anti-nuke cult read Rod Adams the same way that other fundies, like Kurt Wise for instance, reads geology texts.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then how come Iran, Syria and Libya already have them?
I heard it from Unka Dick, so it must be true. It also dispenses soft-serve ice cream on one side and the other is an HD TV screen with free porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC