Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thin-film industry heats up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:37 PM
Original message
Thin-film industry heats up
http://www.sustainableindustries.com/breakingnews/19084154.html

Thin-film industry heats up

by Becky Brun - 5.21.08
MAINZ, GERMANY

The second quarter of 2008 brought a flood of announcements from global companies entering the thin-film solar game.

German solar panel manufacturer Schott Solar in May launched an independent company for its thin-film photovoltaics (PV) business sector. The company expects, within the next few years, the annual production capacity at its two locations in Jena and Putzbrunn near Munich will expand from 36 to 100 megawatts. Meanwhile, DuPont (NYSE: DD) announced plans to enter the thin-film solar market with a new Hong Kong research center and a thin-film manufacturing facility in Shenzhen.

Japanese electronics manufacturer Sharp Corp. and Italy's Enel SpA, which are teaming up to build solar power plants throughout Italy that would generate a combined capacity of more than 160 megawatts, also recently announced they are considering partnering on a thin-film PV plant in Italy.

The solar industry's silicon shortage have accelerated investments in thin-film technologies. San Jose, Calif.-based Nanosolar—which is backed by private investors including Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, Benchmark Capital and Stanford University—shipped its first thin-film solar modules to a German power plant in December 2007 . Austin, Tex.-based Heliovolt Corp., which raised over $100 million in venture financing in 2007, reported in May it has produced thin-film solar cells with 12.2 percent conversion efficiency in a record-setting six minutes.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. 12.2% from a thin-film? Color me skeptical.
There have been similar claims before, but they always fell apart under standard rigorous testing. 6% is pretty high for a thin-film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. HelioVolt Exceeds 12% Solar Thin Film Efficiency with Rapid, Scalable Printing Process
Edited on Wed May-21-08 01:44 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.heliovolt.net//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=131&Itemid=95

HelioVolt Exceeds 12% Solar Thin Film Efficiency with Rapid, Scalable Printing Process

Industry-Leading CIGS Photovoltaic Cell Efficiency Announced at IEEE Conference

San Diego, California – May 12, 2008 – In results presented at the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, HelioVolt Corporation announces that its proprietary FASST® reactive transfer printing process has produced thin film solar cells with 12.2 percent conversion efficiencies in a record setting six minutes. The efficiencies place HelioVolt’s Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) devices among the highest performing solar thin film products on the market today. HelioVolt is currently optimizing FASST for further efficiency gains and scaling up the process to begin commercial manufacture of thin film solar modules and building integrated solar products.

“In the lab, CIGS is already achieving the highest efficiencies of any thin film solar material. The challenge of course is transferring that efficiency to a high throughput, high yield, low cost process capable of delivering gigawatts worth of quality commercial product,” said Dr. BJ Stanbery, CEO and founder of HelioVolt. “We view these high-performance results as an indicator of FASST’s potential to meet that need. We’re already producing CIGS devices that are comparable with the highest efficiency thin film products on the market today, and we still see plenty of room to improve from here.”

Thin film technologies aim to lower the cost of photovoltaic (PV) products by reducing the amount of material required to produce electricity from the sun. HelioVolt’s FASST process further reduces costs by manufacturing CIGS thin film products ten to one hundred times more rapidly than competitive processes including co-evaporation and two-stage selenization. Confirmed by independent testing at Colorado State University, the high-throughput printing process delivers a uniform photovoltaic cell with high conversion efficiency, or percentage of sun energy the device converts into electricity. HelioVolt’s 12.2 percent efficiency devices consisted of CIGS photovoltaic thin film layer applied to a glass substrate. The FASST process can also be used to print high efficiency, low-cost thin film material directly on glass substrates for solar modules or onto building products including architectural glass and roofing tiles.

Dr. Stanbery will present HelioVolt’s efficiency results today during his keynote address at the 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, the industry's most respected global gathering of leading scientists and engineers. Delivering a presentation entitled “Entrepreneurship on the Road from Science to Sales,” Dr. Stanbery joins David Eaglesham, vice president of technology for First Solar and Richard Swanson, president and chief technical officer of SunPower Corporation in the keynote session.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Golden, CO, USA: NREL Sets New CIGS Thin Film Efficiency Record (19.9%)
http://www.solarbuzz.com/news/NewsNATE50.htm
March 30, 2008

Golden, CO, USA: NREL Sets New CIGS Thin Film Efficiency Record

Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory have moved closer to creating a thin-film solar cell that can compete with the efficiency of the more common silicon-based solar cell.

The copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) thin-film solar cell recently reached 19.9 percent efficiency, setting a new world record for this type of cell. Multicrystalline silicon-based solar cells have shown efficiencies as high as 20.3 percent. The energy conversion efficiency of a solar cell is the percentage of sunlight converted by the cell into electricity.

“This is an important milestone,” said NREL Senior Scientist Miguel Contreras. “The thin film people have always looked for matching silicon in performance, and we are reaching that goal.”

Researchers were able to set the world record because of improvements in the quality of the material applied during the manufacturing process, boosting the power output from the cell, Contreras said.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. 12.2 percent conversion efficiency
I'm no expert in this area but I guess that's a good efficiency rate for this new type of solar material. Hopefully, they'll eventually get it up to 90% or better. At that point, things could get very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The most exotic (not thin film) and efficient cells are pushing 37%
But that is close to miraculous. 90% is never going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Of course it will happen one day - it will just take time and a lot of investment
We need a government that wages a major long term campaign to make the miraculous happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. As an electrical engineer, I have to recognize certain physical limits.
Knocking electrons loose with photons always entails some energy lost to the crystal lattice as heat. Many materials have been tried, so the properties of the candidates are pretty well known. I would wager on PV hitting 50% by 2050, but that's as far as I'd go. Now, you might capture more energy by combining PV and thermal into one package. Concentrate the light onto the cells, and carry the excess heat away with a fluid medium. The fluid serves double duty, like your car's interior heater - it cools the pwer source, and heats something that needs heat (your toes or your water heater).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The thing is, you don't need 90%
Let's say I have a 100% efficient solar cell! (It'll probably never happen; but humor me.) Okay, it's 1 square meter, and that's all I need for whatever it is I'm doing.

What if I had a 50% efficient cell? (That's beyond our capabilities today.) OK, now I need a square that's 1.4~ meters on a side. (You get the same power, from a cell that's not really all that much bigger.)

Alright, so what if I only had a 25% efficient cell? (This is feasible today.) Now, my panel needs to be 2 meters by 2 meters. (Is that really that bad?)


(You see what I'm getting at here?) You really don't need 90% efficiency. If you can produce a 25% efficient cell, at a reasonable price, that's great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finishline42 Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. 12.2% doesn't sound great, but
would a valid comparison be to ask what's the efficiency rate for coal to electricity at an outlet in my abode when the closest power plant is 20 miles away? Which begs the question, how much power is lost between the power plant and consumer?

Actually, I understand that higher is better, but is 12% so inefficient that it's not worth our time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. 12% could possibly be cost- and carbon-effective,
meaning cheaper to manufacture, install, and maintain over its life, per kilowatt-hour, than equivalent coal power. At 12% you'd probably have to entirely cover a pretty large roof to power your house, but it could be practical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC