Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Storing the Sun: Molten Salt Provides Highly Efficient Thermal Storage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 09:17 AM
Original message
Storing the Sun: Molten Salt Provides Highly Efficient Thermal Storage
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=52873

Despite their widespread use, solar technologies suffer the limitation of most renewable technologies: an unpredictable operating profile due to weather variations. However, using the highly efficient properties of molten salt for heat transfer, one technology insulates electricity production from weather volatility and, more importantly, it offers the capability to dispatch electricity as needed without requiring the use of natural gas. This technology is a concentrating solar power (CSP) technology, built around a proprietary central receiver tower and molten salt loop.

Thermal storage is widely regarded as the future for the renewable energy campaign because, unlike many intermittent renewable resources such as wind energy, it offers a "zero-emissions" technology with firm capacity and dispatchability characteristics. The thermal storage system provides an added benefit: allowing the plant to be designed to optimize the electricity load profile to meet specific market needs. A plant can be designed, for instance, to maximize electricity production during a period of peak demand or to continue to produce electricity after the sun goes down.

Figure 1 (left) illustrates how the thermal storage system can be utilized to "shift" electricity production to the peak demand period. Solar energy is collected when the sun begins to shine, but electricity is produced approximately 6 hours later in order to generate electricity during a period of peak demand. The red line represents direct solar irradiation, the solid blue line represents the production curve without storage and the dotted blue line represents the production curve with 6-hr storage.

Technology Description

Thermal storage technology uses a solar "power tower" design, which generates power from sunlight by focusing energy onto a tower-mounted central heat exchanger or receiver.

<more>





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds good to me.
Let's build some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. But, but, but I keep hearing how "energy can't be stored" from
all the naysayers and oil/nuclear shills........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, what we say is that it adds cost and environmental impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Nah. People actually DO say, "Energy can't be stored."
Then when you bring up batteries and such they fall silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. I keep hearing about molten salt.
But I am not hearing about ultra widespread use yet.

Lets hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Quoth Fundie anti-nuke Amory Lovins in 1976, inventor of the hydrogen HYPErcar that will be in
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 06:44 PM by NNadir
showrooms by 2005:

Energy storage is often said to he a major problem of energy-income technologies. But this ''problem" is largely an artifact of trying to recentralize, upgrade and redistribute inherently diffuse energy flows. Directly storing sunlight or wind—or, for that matter, electricity from any source— is indeed difficult on a large scale. But it is easy if done on a scale and in an energy quality matched to most end-use needs. Daily, even seasonal, storage of low-and medium-temperature heat at the point of use is straightforward with water tanks, rock beds, or perhaps fusible salts. Neighborhood heat storage is even cheaper. In industry, wind-generated compressed air can easily (and, with due care, safely) be stored to operate machinery: the technology is simple, cheap, reliable and highly developed. (Some cities even used to supply compressed air as a standard utility.) Installing pipes to distribute hot water (or compressed air) tends to be considerably cheaper than installing equivalent electric distribution capacity. Hydroelectricity is stored behind dams, and organic conversion yields readily stored liquid and gaseous fuels. On the whole, therefore, energy storage is much less of a problem in a soft energy economy than in a hard one.


Lovins, Amoral, "The Road Not Taken," Foreign Affairs, page 83, October 1976

It's easy. Not a problem. (Bold, of course, is mine.)

Note that when the famous dangerous natural gas apologist was talking about molten salts - the only correct statements in his insufferably stupid paper were those where he quoted the inventor of the molten salt nuclear reactor, the great Alvin Weinberg - he used the word fusible.

So one might ask Amoral Lovins where, 30 years and several hundred billions of dangerous fossil fuel waste dumping later, exactly, are all these "neighborhood" solar energy tanks containing fusible salts?

In the last 6 years here in this forum, there have been about a brazillion posts on this subject, each of them presenting it as if it were a new and original idea. The amount of energy consumed by people reading on the internets about how wonderfulicious solar thermal storage tanks are almost certainly exceeds the amount of energy actually stored in these devices since Lovins announced how great they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes the molten salts idea has been around for years now
and one of the reason that it isn't being used on a large scale is because pro nuke people like yourself have been fighting tooth and nail against anything except nuclear energy all these years. Then of course the fossil fuels folks have been adding their part too, shit like we have an unlimited supply of coal etc so why do we need this.

What I really want to know though is, why do you feel you have to drop your pants and take a big ol' shit on any thread that has anything to do with solar or wind and the advancements being proposed and/or made. I could care less about your personal vendetta with Amory Lovins nor the convulated reasons you've given to try to convince me and others to believe what you think about him. Man, grow the fuck up and add to the discussion rather than tearing this person a new ass at every turn, at every chance you get. give it up. Personally I would pay to see a discussion between you and he as I have a feeling you would be handed your ass, all, every damn bit of it.

How is tearing into new, or in this case, old technology productive, how does that help us? We gave nuclear energy many years to develop a process to deal with the waste but after all this time and much money spent still nothing has been found that we can say is a safe way to deal with it.

So I will say once again I am against adding anymore nuclear plants under any circumstances until that is dealt with in a way that is viable and safe for the duration of its dangerous radiation.

You have no idea as to what to do with it

why am I not susprised

It bothers me not that a person has a certain thought or belief, what bothers me is that person who can not for whatever reason see that there is often other ways to see things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Geothermal Applications?
I admit that I'm a liberal arts major, but I'm wondering if molten salt could be used for closed-cycle geothermal applications. While admittedly of only marginal help here in the US, I'd always thought that geothermal power generation would be a boon for Central America and some of the Andean countries, particularly the ones with very "hot spots."

I did some casual conversation with someone who had worked on geothermal; he said that it's a surprisingly dirty technology. When steam is piped into hot formation, it brings up a lot of nasty, corrosive, and often toxic mineral deposits. I can't help but wonder if a closed-cycle molten salt system might not be a better way to go about it.

I'll defer to knowledge and experience. If I'm wrong, please let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. In closed-circuit geothermal, there's no reason to add complexity.
Plain old water would work just fine and eliminate additional heat transfer stages. You can't run a steam turbine directly with molten salt.

The idea behind the molten salts is for energy storage - they stay hot for hours (or days) as an energy storage medium. When you have a cloudy day, the salts are still hot enough to generate steam. With geothermal, there's no reason to store the energy - it's always available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC