Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FirstEnergy customers lose chance to save billions in electricity costs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 01:05 PM
Original message
FirstEnergy customers lose chance to save billions in electricity costs
Edited on Fri Oct-17-03 01:47 PM by SpikeTrees
10/17/03

Julie Carr Smyth
Plain Dealer Bureau

Columbus - The office charged with protecting Ohio utility consumers has destroyed a closely guarded consultant's report that might have saved billions of dollars for customers in FirstEnergy electric territory.

..........snip.........

The last few paragraphs are the thesis of the article, so they are my excerpt. A report that would have shown Ohio customers owe $ Billions less in stranded costs was shredded by an industry-friendly bureaucrat in the state government. In other words, we got hosed again.

........excerpt.........
"FirstEnergy wanted two things: They wanted money and they wanted no competition." Tongren said. "We decided in a direction where at least one of FirstEnergy's goals is going to be thwarted: We're going to produce competition."

But Henry Eckhart, a former PUCO commissioner who represented several consumer groups in the debate, said Tongren should have made the LaCapra estimate public. "Why did he keep it hidden?" Eckhart asked. "I know why: They would have had testimony that FirstEnergy wasn't entitled to any - or to very little - in terms of stranded costs."

Hughes of Citizen Power was still more critical of Tongren's actions. "It's his job to protect ratepayers and he did the opposite."
.....end of article ...........

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1066383241264300.xml

edit:link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there a
link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. If this were France, they'd be calling for the man's head.
literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stupdworld Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. SIMPSONS DID IT
i mean bush did it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benfranklin1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Say what again Mr. Tongren?
Edited on Fri Oct-17-03 03:14 PM by benfranklin1776
"{Ohio Consumers' Counsel} Tongren said he did not know that his staff had shortened the
retention period to one year. "

You are the chief counsel running the office but
you did not know that your staff had shortened the retention period of
your office's documents? Are there no computers in the office either on which such a document could be stored?
The ratepayers are hosed yet again.

Love this bit of tortured logic:

"Tongren, too, signed off on the settlement, which allowed FirstEnergy to
collect stranded costs through monthly electric bills for five years.
{utility spokesman} DiNicola said rates did not increase, however, because the costs already
were being figured into existing bills. "

Well gee there sherlock if the stranded cost estimates were too high then I would say the costs which were figured into the bills that each consumer paid was too high and they are entitled to a refund since they have been paying it all along.

And yes we see the twisted corporate illogic running rampant these days. They believe they are ENTITLED to gouge the consumer. Notice how they view the higher rates as their property right.

"If the company's request had not been met, he added, "that would have
been confiscation without representation"

Sorry Jack there is no confiscation of property i.e. a compensable taking if you were not legally entitled to the property in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-17-03 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Our stranded costs are > 6 cents/kW*hour in Northern Ohio
When they "deregulated" electricity in Ohio, consumers were stuck with a greater than 6 cent charge--on top of electricity charges from the actual producers--to pay the stranded costs of two nuke plants that went way over budget and some newer coal fired plants. The electricity we buy beyond that is also more than 6 cents/kW*hour. We are paying 13 cents/kW*hour when done. In comparison, parts of Ohio that have purely coal-fired plants pay about 7 or 8 cents/kW*hour.

Northern Ohio consumers are being forced to pay for the project planning mistakes of executives at Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison, and Toledo Edison. The merged company, First Energy, is being bailed out by the Ohio (and Pennsylvania) consumers. First Energy should be allowed to go bankrupt, just like Long Island Light Company (LILCO) did decades ago when they made mistakes. First Energy has huge problems with the Davis-Besse nuclear plant (a big hole in the containment vessel) that has caused high repair costs and loss of service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC