Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Depleted uranium already here:..and feds have no rules yet on storing large quantities of it. (Utah)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 04:33 PM
Original message
Depleted uranium already here:..and feds have no rules yet on storing large quantities of it. (Utah)
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2280682/

Significant quantities of depleted uranium are already buried in Utah, well in advance of new federal regulations aimed at determining how much of the unusual metal can be disposed of safely in one place.

The Utah Radiation Control Board heard Tuesday that 49,000 tons of "DU," as it's often called, has been taken to EnergySolutions Inc.'s specialized landfill in Tooele County since the site opened in 1988.

Radiation Control Division Director Dane Finerfrock told board members about the DU volumes as part of his report on recent decisions by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Federal regulators reaffirmed their decision last month to keep DU's hazard rating as "Class A," the category used for the least-dangerous low-level radioactive waste and considered suitable for "small volumes" of DU, about 1 to 11 tons. The NRC also said it would begin to craft regulations for "large volumes" of DU that need disposal in a couple of years, as new uranium enrichment plants come online.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Depleted Uranium isn't any more radioactive than the original ore.
Put it back into the mine it came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Won't work
As pointed out in the article:
Board members discussed one reason regulating depleted uranium is so tough: Its radioactive decay products actually become more hazardous over time, peaking after 1 million years, according to the NRC. In effect, regulators are faced with determining a safe exposure far into the future.


This was one of the problems with Yucca mountain.
Also, uranium is being increasingly mined using ISL, you really want to pump this crap back into the groundwater?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not familiar with ISL, but as to your other point
If you have 100 tons of uranium ore that has 95 tons of U-235 and 5 tons of U-238, what does it matter if you take away the 5 tones of U-238? The U-235 is still going to decay regardless, is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. ISL = in situ leaching
Pump sulfuric acid or ammonium carbonate into ore-bearing rock, mobilize uranium (and other metals), pump out leachate, extract uranium, pump contaminated leachate back into ground water.

A loverly way to pollute...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC