Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mercury Risk Overstated, (GOP controlled) House Panel Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 11:46 AM
Original message
Mercury Risk Overstated, (GOP controlled) House Panel Says
Where do they get "mercury levels in fish have remained constant or declined slightly since the 1970s"???

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/health/AP-Mercury-Pollution.html

Mercury Risk Overstated, (GOP controlled) House Panel Says
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: February 16, 2005



WASHINGTON (AP) -- Dangers of toxic mercury pollution in the environment have been overstated, the House Resources Committee says in a report issued in anticipation of new regulatory proposals from the Bush administration.

The report, written by aides to the committee's majority Republicans and being released Wednesday, also says no link between mercury from coal-burning power plants and levels of mercury in fish has been scientifically established.<snip>

Instead, EPA now favors an industry-backed alternative that would order a reduction in mercury pollution nationwide with individual plants permitted to meet their allowance by buying pollution rights from companies already in compliance.

``With a more restrictive, unnecessary regulation we could see a large portion of this country's coal supplies become useless,'' said Rep. Jim Gibbons, R-Nev., chairman of the resource panel's energy and resources subcommittee. ``A cap-and-trade approach will reduce mercury emissions while maintaining coal as a viable source of energy.''<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. mercury pollution from trash incinerators has been greatly reduced
There was a great mercury (Hg) problem in Florida seafood. Environmentalists and the food and restaurant industries teamed up to eliminate trash incinerators as a source of Hg (they closed them). That may be a reason for a cited decrease in Hg levels in fish.

This bush plan of 70% reduction still allows three times as much mercury as the Clinton EPA plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cap and Trade will not address Hg problems
As a heavy metal that doesn't mix into the atmosphere and is deposited, the effects of Hg are more localized than other pollutants(i.e SO2). A cap & trade policy would allow for the development of "hotspots"; say a plant in NH emits Hg at levels far under the cap, it would then ba able to trade (sell) its 'excess' cap room to a plant in Detroit that could then far exceed the cap. Nice for the folks in NH but not so good for the fine citizens of Detroit. You can be sure that the low income, non-white communties are the ones that will feel the brunt of this policy.

For Hg regulations to be equitable and effective, there must be mandatory caps at each and every smokestack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC