Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rodent Size (and head shape) Linked to Human Population and Climate Change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:34 PM
Original message
Rodent Size (and head shape) Linked to Human Population and Climate Change
http://tigger.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/newsbureau/cgi-bin/index.cgi?from=Releases&to=Release&id=2540&start=1241386239&end=1249162239&topic=0&dept=0
UIC NEWS BUREAU

Office of Public Affairs (MC 288)
601 S. Morgan St., Chicago IL 60607-7113, (312) 996-3456
www.news.uic.edu

July 31, 2009
Contact: Paul Francuch, (312) 996-3457, francuch@uic.edu

Rodent Size Linked to Human Population and Climate Change

You probably hadn't noticed -- but the head shape and overall size of rodents has been changing over the past century. A University of Illinois at Chicago ecologist has tied these changes to human population density and climate change.

The finding is reported by Oliver Pergams, UIC research assistant professor of biological sciences, in the July 31 issue of http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006452">PLoS One.

Pergams said that such size-and-shape changes in mammals, occurring around the world in less than a century, are quite substantial.

He had done earlier studies on a century's worth of anatomic changes between two geographically isolated rodents -- Channel Island deer mice from coastal California and white-footed mice northwest of Chicago -- and noted fast change among both.

"I suspected they weren't unique examples," he said. "I wondered whether these changes were occurring elsewhere, whether they were global in nature, and what some of the causes may be."

Pergams examined specimen rodents from museums around the world, including the big collections held at Chicago's Field Museum and the Smithsonian in Washington. Altogether, he recorded more than 17,000 body and skull measurements from 1,300 specimens from 22 locations in Africa, the Americas and Asia. The animals were collected from 1892 to 2001, and Pergams compared those from before 1950 to those collected after.

He also compared specimens gathered from sparsely populated islands to those from the mainland, where human populations were denser.

Pergams found both increases and decreases in the 15 anatomic traits he measured, with changes as great as 50 percent over 80 years. Ten of the 15 traits were associated with changes in human population density, current temperature, or trends in temperature and precipitation.

"Rapid change, contrary to previous opinion, really seems to be happening quite frequently in a number of locations around the world," Pergams said. "There seem to be significant correlations with 'people-caused' parameters, such as population density and anthropologically-caused climate change."

While Pergams' study was by no means comprehensive, it was the first attempt of its kind to examine data on mammals from many global locations to find links between morphological change and variables such as population density and changing climate.

"Species can adapt quickly to rapid environmental changes -- quicker than many people have thought, especially for mammals," said Pergams. "Those mammals that can adapt quickly have a much higher chance to survive big environmental changes caused by humans. Understanding which species and populations have the greatest ability to change has a crucial impact on being able to conserve biodiversity."

The research was funded through a grant from the National Science Foundation and The Nature Conservancy. Climate change at various locations was tracked by Joshua Lawler of the University of Washington, who is co-author of the study.

An MP3 podcast on this subject is available https://blackboard.uic.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/web/news/podcasts/PdCst64-July31%2709-Pergams.mp3">here

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well That's Odd
The article doesn't seem to indicate whether rodents are getting or smaller over time, whether they are larger or smaller in densely populated areas, or for that matter any of the other 14 variable studied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or whether the impact of any other species (predators maybe? hmmm) has contributed to the, as you
Edited on Sat Aug-01-09 04:46 PM by timeforpeace
mention, undisclosed changes. Great, more scarce research dollars wasted on a study of dubious import and with not-at-all-conclusive "findings". But the impact of humans on everything is the hot button these days. Talk about hubris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Which "undisclosed changes?"
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006452


The trait with the most explained deviance was occipital-nasal length, a hybrid measure of nasal length as well as width (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006452#pone-0006452-g001">Fig. 1). Using all cases globally, a model composed of changes in population density and precipitation explained 58% of deviance (http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006452#pone-0006452-t004">Table 4). Explanatory power went up even further using only US cases: 75% of deviance was explained with changes in population density, temperature, and precipitation. We might speculate that this trait increased with human population and precipitation because these led to greater food resources, but decreased with higher temperatures not because of endothermic reasons but because the trait might also be involved in olfaction and the search for food. Therefore the need for a large nasal cavity was less important and there was a decrease in size.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I Understand that the Point of the Article
was the existence of the correlation and that this is an academic paper.

Still, even in the detailed article, the writers seem to go out of their way to make the specific changes they observed as difficult as possible to ferret out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-02-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The actual changes are secondary, relative to the speed with which they have occurred
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0006452
In general, rapid morphological change in mammals has been infrequently documented. Examples that do exist are almost exclusively of rodents on islands. Such changes are usually attributed to selective release or founder events related to restricted gene flow in island settings. Here we document rapid morphological changes in rodents in 20 of 28 museum series collected on four continents, including 15 of 23 mainland sites. Approximately 17,000 measurements were taken of 1302 rodents. Trends included both increases and decreases in the 15 morphological traits measured, but slightly more trends were towards larger size. Generalized linear models indicated that changes in several of the individual morphological traits were associated with changes in human population density, current temperature gradients, and/or trends in temperature and precipitation. When we restricted these analyses to samples taken in the US (where data on human population trends were presumed to be more accurate), we found changes in two additional traits to be positively correlated with changes in human population density. Principle component analysis revealed general trends in cranial and external size, but these general trends were uncorrelated with climate or human population density. Our results indicate that over the last 100+ years, rapid morphological change in rodents has occurred quite frequently, and that these changes have taken place on the mainland as well as on islands. Our results also suggest that these changes may be driven, at least in part, by human population growth and climate change.


However, all of their measurements are available here:
http://www.redrockinstitute.org/uploads/PergamsLawlerMeasurements.xls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I guess you didn't read it very well


Pergams found both increases and decreases in the 15 anatomic traits he measured, with changes as great as 50 percent over 80 years. Ten of the 15 traits were associated with changes in human population density, current temperature, or trends in temperature and precipitation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. OK, So Based on That Sentence
do rats get bigger or smaller in densely populated areas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Latest pictures from the wild
The rodents are getting uglier.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Rodents of unusual size?
I don't think they exist.

ARRRRGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC