Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hybrid vehicle rebates produce scant environmental benefits, high cost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 11:19 AM
Original message
Hybrid vehicle rebates produce scant environmental benefits, high cost
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-08/uobc-hvr080409.php
Public release date: 4-Aug-2009

Contact: Basil Waugh
basil.waugh@ubc.ca
604-822-2048
http://www.ubc.ca/">University of British Columbia

Hybrid vehicle rebates produce scant environmental benefits, high cost

Despite major costs to taxpayers in the U.S. and Canada, government programs that offer rebates to hybrid vehicle buyers are failing to produce environmental benefits, a new UBC study says.

The study finds that hybrid sales have come largely at the expense of small, relatively fuel-efficient, conventional cars, rather than large SUVs, trucks and vans, which produce substantially greater carbon emissions.

"If the intention of rebate programs is to replace gas guzzlers with hybrids, they are failing," says Ambarish Chandra, a professor at UBC's Sauder School of Business and study co-author. He says large vehicle sales have risen steadily since the introduction of hybrid rebates.

"People are choosing hybrids over similarly priced small- and medium-sized conventional cars, which are not far behind hybrids for fuel efficiency and emissions," says Chandra. "The reductions in carbon emissions are therefore not great."

The study also finds that the majority of consumers who purchase hybrids were not motivated to do so by government rebates, says Chandra, whose co-authors include Sumeet Gulati, assistant professor in UBC's Dept. of Food and Resource Economics, and Milind Kandlikar of UBC's Liu Institute for Global Issues and Institute of Asian Research.

"Our estimates indicate that two-thirds of people who buy hybrids were going to buy them anyway," says Chandra. "So for the majority, rebates are not changing behaviour – they are subsidizing planned purchases."

According to the study, the inefficiency of rebate programs rises disproportionately when governments increase rebate levels. "When B.C.'s rebate jumped from $1,000 to $2,000 in 2005, the actual cost of reducing carbon emissions more than doubled," he says, noting that Ontario recently increased its rebate to a maximum of $10,000 per hybrid vehicle.

The study finds that Canadian provinces that offer rebates have spent an average of $195 per tonne of carbon saved or, equivalently, $0.43 for every litre of gasoline that a vehicle consumes over its 15 year average life expectancy.

Chandra says that governments could garner greater environmental benefits by purchasing carbon offsets (currently priced between $3 and $40 per tonne on carbon markets) or investing in green jobs and technologies.

While hybrid rebates help governments to appear environmentally progressive, Chandra suggests that some programs may serve as de facto "bailouts" for the North American auto industry.

"The criteria for Ontario's recent rebate increase seem designed to benefit domestic manufacturers, especially General Motors," Chandra says. "The biggest rebates will be given to purchasers of the Chevy Volt, rather than other hybrids like the Toyota Prius."

Hybrid rebate programs are currently offered by the governments of the U.S. and 13 states, including Washington, Oregon, Illinois and Colorado, and five Canadian provinces, including B.C., Ontario, Quebec, PEI and Manitoba. The Canadian government offered hybrid rebates during 2007-2008.

Researchers used Canadian vehicle sales data over a 17-year period from 1989 to 2006. Results are believed to extend to the U.S. market, given the similarities between auto industries, in terms of vehicle buying patterns, pricing structures and car models.

###

Download the study at: www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/download.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alc Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. don't focus on the wrong measures
Purpose of current hybrids should be to learn, build up infrastructure, and get people used to them so they become an alternative instead of a novelty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. The UBC analysis is an example of the type of ...
... selective economic analysis that got us here in the first place. I was particularly struck by this quote, "If the intention of rebate programs is to replace gas guzzlers with hybrids, they are failing," says Ambarish Chandra, a professor at UBC's Sauder School of Business".


*IF*????

What the eff is the point of doing an analysis of a policy *IF* you don't even know the objective of the policy?

As you said, the purpose is to lay the infrastructure groundwork for an emerging technology that promises to be a key element in the plan to address the climate issue.

So that, of course, leads to the question, "What *is* the point of the UBC exercise if it wasn't to evaluate the actual goal of the policy?

Since it makes a good headline to slam a component of our energy plan, and since it doesn't seem to serve any purpose in actual policy analysis, it seems reasonable to speculate that the objective was to produce that headline.

UBC Business School, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_J Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Seconded.

Incentives contributed to hybrids turning the corner to mass production and mass appeal. That was the real purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. a point I made in July 2008 when I introduced my Votz spreadsheet. If you want to estimate how much
gasoline (and GHG) reductions you can expect you must compare to a similar size and weight car. With plug-ins in particular, in the beginning years they will take sales away from the smaller, lighter more fuel efficient cars. Computing savings in fuel and GHG reductions by using the average fuel consumption for all vehicles will not be accurate, because they will be replacing the more fuel efficient cars.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=160775#160819

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Aside from the preposterous assumptions you used...
are the points raised in prior posts - the goals are larger than the narrow parameters assigned in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. better than 'cash for clunkers' .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC