Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Climate change press coverage gets weird

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 11:30 PM
Original message
Climate change press coverage gets weird
Go figure. Drudge Report slants the spin on the science 180 degrees from reality.


...the PETM is a very singular event in the Cenozoic (last 65 million years). It was the largest and most abrupt perturbation to the carbon cycle over that whole period, defined by an absolutely huge negative isotope spike...
Of course, much of this is speculative given the difficulty in working out what actually happened 55 million years ago. The press response to the Zeebe et al paper was, however, very predictable.
the press release to get passed along by Marc Morano, posted on Drudge, and declared the final nail in the coffin for 'alarmist' global warming science on WUWT (Andrew Freedman at WaPo has a good discussion of this). The fact that what was really being said was that climate sensitivity is probably larger than produced in standard climate models seemed to pass almost all of these people by (though a few of their more astute commenters did pick up on it).
Regardless, the message went out that 'climate models are wrong' with the implicit sub-text that current global warming is nothing to worry about... headlines and titles that simply confirm someone's prior belief...
Thus a much better title for the press release would have been more specific ""Global warming: Our best guess is likely too small" – and much less misinterpretable!






Climate change press coverage gets weird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Politics and Science do not mix
Every time someone tries to do it, it causes trouble.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Global warming: Our best guess is likely too small"
I'd change "is likely" to "may be" myself. But the idea is the same. There is nothing comforting to be drawn from events around the PETM. There may be little that is applicable, but there is definitely nothing comforting or nothing that harms our climate models.

Still, the denialists don't have much else to work with, so I can understand their desperate attempt to prove the models "wrong."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-14-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Marc Morano strikes again!
He truly lives up to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC