Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China study urges greenhouse gas caps, peak in 2030

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 08:52 AM
Original message
China study urges greenhouse gas caps, peak in 2030
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE57G0C520090817

China study urges greenhouse gas caps, peak in 2030

Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:29am EDT

By Chris Buckley

BEIJING (Reuters) - China should set firm targets to limit greenhouse gas emissions so they peak around 2030, a study by some of the nation's top climate change policy advisers has proposed ahead of contentious talks on a new global warming pact.

The call for "quantified targets" to cap greenhouse gas pollution marks a high-level public departure from China's reluctance to spell out a proposed peak and date for it.

"By 2008 China had become the world's biggest national emitter of greenhouse gases and faces unprecedented challenges," says the preface of the 900-page report, setting aside China's reluctance to say it has passed the United States as the top emitter of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas from burning coal, gas and oil.

"As soon as possible, study and draft relative and (then) absolute targets to cap the total volume of carbon dioxide emissions," says the preface of the report, obtained by Reuters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enviralment Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. what about reductions?
I read somewhere that china doesn't expect reductions in Co2 till 2050?

a little late, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-17-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right. This is recommending earlier reductions (i.e. 2030, not 2050)
Edited on Mon Aug-17-09 12:00 PM by OKIsItJustMe
The difference is that 2050 is a figure mentioned by the government.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=205361&mesg_id=205361

2030 is a figure recommended by a study.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC