First let me say that after reading your response, I recognized that you seem to be a fairly intelligent person. Pardon the "daunting" read, but perhaps there is more to it than you may think without further explanation. A company who hires an intern, not to mentioned an unpaid one, is usually a company which has co-op'ed with an educational institution for the student to gain industry experience and college credit, along with a letter of recommendation. I believe what you are referring to in your argument for using interns to provide free labor, is a "probationary" period in which an employer will hire an employee to keep him on (usually over an agreed period of time) the job. If the employee works out, he/she becomes a "full fledged" employee and is usually subject to a pay increase or a promotion of some sort. This was not the case with Centron Solar. Read this article, it will expel any pre-conceived ideas you may have regarding unpaid internships (even in a non-profit):
http://blog.marketplace.nwsource.com/careercenter/hiring_interns_for_free_labor_is_a_no-no.htmlThe tasks which the interns performed at Centron Solar were: Constructing databases of 20 thousand installers, as well as a state-by-state incentive database nationwide in spreadsheet format (data-entry,) market research, calling inverter companies to have solar panels included in their string sizing charts, sales, and project design for prospective clients- one being Nike. The project design involved doing cost analysis for the inverters, and racking systems while attempting to co-brand Centron's company name with these companies. The reality is, Centron Solar sought it fit to take advantage of students in a college town to prevent start-up costs otherwise incurred through hiring someone to do the job. The company settled with the intern and paid them in full. The intern even states in the article that he claimed minimum wage as this was not an effort to profit from the mishap, but to demonstrate the necessity for employers to abide, in the least, by our minimum wage laws. This is setting a good example, as there is no such thing as free labor in this country, hence abolition of slavery and introduction to labor laws. Only one of the interns was not enrolled in college, and the intern who did file would go back to continue his academia. Seems odd for a fellow democrat to be so negatively inclined in defense of a college student intern who was exploited by a foreign corporation for free labor... maybe you need to be on the conservative underground instead?
Lofty and extravagant promises of employment, not only through hiring interns in pretense of providing an internship, but also in announcing the creation of 350 jobs in Eugene, and yet another 100 jobs in Vancouver, Washington. The Hynix building in Eugene was "too" clean, while the Panasonic building in Vancouver was "too outdated." What you have here is essentially a company president "shopping around" for assembly plants while promising hundreds of jobs like he is shopping for a pair of tennis shoes. Based on what sales-revenue? Projected revenue should not account for announcing hundreds of jobs, then taking his word back like the CEO and founder of Suntech who admittedly said he was selling his panels on the US market below the production, shipping, and distribution costs. Not once, but twice in one interview. Only when EU solar panel makers were in outrage of these statements did he have his cronies call the NY Times to take his words back like he misunderstood. The guy received his degree from an Australian University, as did Ocean Yuan at University of Oregon. There's just no excuse to make such statements, then take them back because of a culture or language barrier.
You said: "Other than that the only thing I learned is that this is a consortium of chinese solar panel manufacturers and thaat they intend to build SIX factories (each probably costing 1/2-1 billion dollars) HERE and hire Americans to build solar panels that will be installed by Americans on American homes and businesses."
This sound fantastic, doesn't it? What you may, or may not, be taking into account in this conclusion is that all Centron Solar does is distribute solar panels from lesser known solar panel manufacturers in China such as NESL Solartec and Jetion. As you may know, these manufacturers have model numbers on their solar panels, which, in fact are already on the California Energy Commission SB1 (Senate Bill 1) list as eligible for subsidies. Notably the DJ-175D and the DJ-180D from NESL-
http://www.gosolarcalifornia.org/equipment/pvmodule.htmlOk, so now you have it established. Both these models are on the SB1 list under their manufacturer Changzhou NESL Solartech. These two models are the exact same models as Centron Solar are distributing at the moment, but they have changed their model numbers to CS-S-175-DJ and CS-S-180-DJ. There are documents which prove that Centron Solar are in fact representing these models, that they have changed their model numbers, and that they have intended to keep their manufacturer undisclosed (for obvious reasons.) Centron then claims to be a "consortium" of 30 manufacturers who have come together to create their product. Again, although this might be a future prospect, it is not true as of yet. In essence, they are claiming to be their "own" brand. They are not their "own" brand, and if they were they would have to be inspected by UL in order to receive the necessary certification to even sell their products on the US market to begin with. A company may private label a manufacturers solar panels as long as UL has accepted this in the form a multiple listee letter, but they cannot change the model numbers all-together, claim to be a different product, and carry the UL logo. I mean, how much more convincing does it take to have any suspicion that this company is not following the rules. If every Tom, Dick, and Harry could do this- there would be hundreds, if not thousands, of American entrepreneurs who would love to jump on this opportunity. Not only would that create wealth that stays in this country, but also a way for Americans to implement and develop these products further, thus become self-sustaining in the long run. What you have obviously neglected to realize is that Centron Solar is duplicating a product together with its cartel-like affiliates, found a loophole in our system, and intend on bypassing antitrust and protectionist (yes we have them) laws in order to materialize into a legit operation, which they obviously are not at this point in time no matter how much you would like them to be. Basically, Centron Solar launched their product at the InterSolar2009 trade show in SF during the month of July- what they didn't tell people there was that they were merely a distributing channel for NESL and Jetion. Yingli, another Chinese company along with many other Chinese companies, have been forthright in the presentation of their products- to those companies I respect dearly and I truly do wish them the best in their efforts to introduce an honest product, marketing, and sales plan into this country.
Tinfoil hat territory? Excuse me...?
As it is hard to prove that a company is dumping their products on our industries, and which take months worth of investigation for the anti-dumping department at the Imports Administration to prove, if any, that China is, in fact, dumping solar panels on the US market. Red flags, however, should be raised when a company like Centron Solar announce in media and press that they promise a 10% cheaper quoting regimen than any US competitors, including their Chinese counterparts Suntech. Hello, is anybody home?? Maybe you need to take off your tin-foil hat so your big head can pop out to its big headed size and start functioning the way it should be. Like I said previously, I believe in my last post, that I spoke with an analyst who had done a feasibility report on NESL's production and had concluded it was impossible to produce these panels at such a low cost, yes even in China, without going bankrupt in the process. Even if they were using slaves and child-labor they still couldn't do it. What indication does that lead you to believe? That the Chinese are so happy to aid in our "green revolution" that they are happy to just give us the solar panels for free?????? WOW... So where the hell is the money coming from? A) Chinese Govt. B) Investors C) Both?
It's a win/win either way when our subsidized government dollars are being funneled straight back into China for every dollar spent on a "eligible for subsidy" solar panel from China while giving all our American installers (who are already supplying the demand for solar anyways) jobs. Which rock are you living under? Catchword being: "We have to stimulate the demand, WE HAVE TO STIMULATE THE DEMAND!!" Again, it's not tires, chemicals, linens, or steel we're talking about here as our government officials are making it easier every single day for China to dominate and control our renewable energy industry. Deflation, deflation, deflation. Do you know why this is?
According to Joseph Fleshman at the California Energy Commission: "in the spirit of California Public Resources Code Section 25780, it seems to me, personally, that a reduction in the price of solar will help create a "self-sufficient solar industry in which solar energy systems are a viable mainstream option for both homes and businesses." Reminds me of Anthony Kiedis' words in "Californication." Califonia sets the standards in solar industry nation-wide (for the most part) since it is one of the biggest consumer markets for solar besides Arizona. Arizona is home to FirstSolar- they definitely would not allow this to happen in their state. Regardless, it seem apparent that California supports deflation in the solar industry, which in turn shows that they are bent on one idea. That idea is to drive down prices regardless of the environmental, educational and capital costs in doing so. In order to become a global leader in renewable energy, we also need white collar jobs in the green industry, not just blue collared ones. Ownership of our inventions and innovations should only be reasonable. I am yet unfamiliar why Chinese manufacturers have managed to get the patents for Solar production, unless it has run out, or has been sold to them. There is no doubt China's manufacturing capabilities revolve of duplication, copying, and providing our consumer with similar goods at a cheaper price. That's a no brain'er, even with a tin-foil hat on.
Ok, just to make it clear to you. This, to me, is not about "buy american," protectionism and isolationism. No, no, no. There is nothing new about solar, nor Chinese manufacture that we previously have not been accustomed to. What is new is our vulnerable economy, and aggressive Chinese enterprises who are engaging in unconventional trading, marketing, and sales practices in order to, again, dominate and monopolize our solar industry with their cheap, government subsidized production solar panels.
I hope this served to be a more "eye-catching" read for you, and that you were entertained to the very, very end like what a great professor in college would demand from their students. It doesn't matter, you will see in the months and years to come what will unfold.