Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Link Between 1918 El Niño And Flu Pandemic

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 05:40 PM
Original message
Link Between 1918 El Niño And Flu Pandemic
http://dmc-news.tamu.edu/templates/?a=8028&z=15

Link Between 1918 El Niño And Flu Pandemic

Monday, September 14, 2009 - 10

Research conducted at Texas A&M University casts doubts on the notion that El Niño has been getting stronger because of global warming and raises interesting questions about the relationship between El Niño and a severe flu pandemic 91 years ago. The findings are based on analysis of the 1918 El Niño, which the new research shows to be one of the strongest of the 20th century.

El Niño occurs when unusually warm surface waters form over vast stretches of the eastern Pacific Ocean and can affect weather systems worldwide. Using advanced computer models, Benjamin Giese, a professor of oceanography who specializes in ocean modeling, and his co-authors conducted a simulation of the global oceans for the first half of the 20th century and they find that, in contrast with prior descriptions, the 1918-19 El Niño was one of the strongest of the century.

Giese’s work will be published in the current "Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society," and the research project was funded by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the National Science Foundation.

Giese says there were few measurements of the tropical Pacific Ocean in 1918, the last year of World War I, and the few observations that are available from 1918 are mostly along the coast of South America. “But the model results show that the El Niño of 1918 was stronger in the central Pacific, with a weaker signature near the coast,” Giese explains. “Thus the limited measurements likely missed detecting the 1918 El Niño.”

Giese adds, “The most commonly used indicator of El Niño is the ocean temperature anomaly in the central Pacific Ocean. By that standard, the 1918-19 El Niño is as strong as the events in 1982-83 and 1997-98, considered to be two of the strongest events on record, causing some researchers to conclude that El Niño has been getting stronger because of global warming. Since the 1918-19 El Niño occurred before significant warming from greenhouse gasses, it makes it difficult to argue that El Niño s have been getting stronger.”

The El Niño of 1918 coincided with one of the worst droughts in India, he adds. “It is well known that there is a connection between El Niño and the failure of the Indian monsoon, just as there is a well-established connection between El Niño and Atlantic hurricane intensity,” Giese says. In addition to drought in India and Australia, 1918 was also a year in which there were few Atlantic hurricanes.

The research also raises questions about El Niño and mortality from the influenza pandemic of 1918. By mid-1918, a flu outbreak – which we now know was the H1N1 strain that is of great concern today – was sweeping the world, and the resulting fatalities were catastrophic: At least 25 million people died worldwide, with some estimates as high as 100 million deaths. India was particularly hard hit by the influenza.

“We know that there is a connection between El Niño and drought in India,” Giese notes.

“It seems probable that mortality from influenza was high in India because of famine associated with drought, so it is likely that El Niño contributed to the high mortality from influenza in India.”

The flu epidemic of 1918, commonly called the “Spanish Flu,” is believed to be the greatest medical holocaust in history. It lasted from March of 1918 to June of 1920, and about 500 million people worldwide became infected, with the disease killing between 25 million to 100 million, most of them young adults. An estimated 17 million died in India, between 500,000 to 675,000 died in the U.S. and another 400,000 died in Japan.

Could the events of 1918 be a harbinger of what might occur in 2009?

Giese says there are some interesting parallels. The winter and spring in 1918 were unusually cold throughout North America, just at the time influenza started to spread in the central U.S. That was followed by a strengthening El Niño and subsequent drought in India. As the El Niño matured in the fall of 1918, the influenza became a pandemic.

With a moderate to strong El Niño now forming in the Pacific and the H1N1 flu strain apparently making a vigorous comeback, the concerns today are obvious, Giese adds.

-30-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Germany better watch itself, remember 1918, started with a flu, ended in revolution
One of the reason believe to have cause the failure of the German Spring Offensive of 1918 was the sheer number of German Soldiers out do to the flu (and reduction in troops combat ability as they came down with the flu while fighting). Shortage of food do to the War also "Helped" (Before WWI Germany imported its food from Russia, during the War Germany took Poland but never was quite able to get food production back to pre-war efforts, in fact one of the conditions of the Peace between Germany and Russia in January 1918 was a massive shipment of food from Russia to Germany (Austria was to get a share, but Germany took it all leaving Austria with nothing and Vienna starving).

This failure destroyed any hope of Germany winning WWI, Germany's actions after the Failure of the Offensive was more trying to preserve a good as negotiating position as it could when it came time to surrender.

Just a comment on 1918, an important year in the history of the War.

Side-Note: There is a debate of which military operation was larger, The German Spring Offensive of 1918 or Desert Storm. These were massive interrelated operations. Technically Hitler's attack on Russia involved more men and material, but that was divided between three commands and three independent invading armies. Operation Overload (The Invasion of France during WWII) was made up of less then Six Divisions do to transportation limitations (And the fact most of the German Army was tied up in Russia). The 1918 Spring Offensive involved more men and Artillery then Desert Storm (involved up to 80 Divisions in three armies all fighting on one operation), but Desert Storm had Air Power to replace much of the Artillery and Tanks and Infantry Fighting Vehicles to replace the sheer number of infantry divisions the Germans used. Just a comment on how BIG the German Offensive was and how a small thing like the Spanish flu may have been a big part in its defeat.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Offensive
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Offensive

Operation Michael, the first part of the plan and what is compared with Desert Strom:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Michael
http://books.google.com/books?id=EeZQ-JchNMoC&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=1918+German+Spring+Offensive+Order+of+battle&source=bl&ots=8YxtbN1otz&sig=nkAqDhehuriOzVVt_KC78Zk1yV4&hl=en&ei=09yuSruSMIKz8QackOXHCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5#v=onepage&q=1918%20German%20Spring%20Offensive%20Order%20of%20battle&f=false

The British have had a problem naming this battle, trying to make it several different battles as opposed to one single operation. Since the 1960s even the British have come to call it the name given by the German Commander, the Kaiser's Battle.

Desert Storm, Order of Battle:
http://www.tim-thompson.com/desert-storm.html
http://www.vii-corps.org/DesertStorm/DesertStorm.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC