Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Loss of top predators causing surge in smaller predators, ecosystem collapse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 12:13 PM
Original message
Loss of top predators causing surge in smaller predators, ecosystem collapse
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/oct/loss-top-predators-causing-surge-smaller-predators-ecosystem-collapse

Loss of top predators causing surge in smaller predators, ecosystem collapse

10-1-09

CORVALLIS, Ore. – The catastrophic decline around the world of “apex” predators such as wolves, cougars, lions or sharks has led to a huge increase in smaller “mesopredators” that are causing major economic and ecological disruptions, a new study concludes.

The findings, published today in the journal Bioscience, found that in North America all of the largest terrestrial predators have been in decline during the past 200 years while the ranges of 60 percent of mesopredators have expanded. The problem is global, growing and severe, scientists say, with few solutions in sight.

An example: in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, lion and leopard populations have been decimated, allowing a surge in the “mesopredator” population next down the line, baboons. In some cases children are now being kept home from school to guard family gardens from brazen packs of crop-raiding baboons.

“This issue is very complex, and a lot of the consequences are not known,” said William Ripple, a professor of forest ecosystems and society at Oregon State University. “But there’s evidence that the explosion of mesopredator populations is very severe and has both ecological and economic repercussions.”

In case after case around the world, the researchers said, primary predators such as wolves , lions or sharks have been dramatically reduced if not eliminated, usually on purpose and sometimes by forces such as habitat disruption, hunting or fishing. Many times this has been viewed positively by humans, fearful of personal attack, loss of livestock or other concerns. But the new picture that’s emerging is a range of problems, including ecosystem and economic disruption that may dwarf any problems presented by the original primary predators.

“I’ve done a lot of work on wildlife in Africa, and people everywhere are asking some of the same questions, what do we do?” said Clinton Epps, an assistant professor at OSU who is studying the interactions between humans and wildlife. “Most important to understand is that these issues are complex, the issue is not as simple as getting rid of wolves or lions and thinking you’ve solved some problem. We have to be more careful about taking what appears to be the easy solution.”

The elimination of wolves is often favored by ranchers, for instance, who fear attacks on their livestock. However, that has led to a huge surge in the number of coyotes, a “mesopredator” once kept in check by the wolves. The coyotes attack pronghorn antelope and domestic sheep, and attempts to control them have been hugely expensive, costing hundreds of millions of dollars.

“The economic impacts of mesopredators should be expected to exceed those of apex predators in any scenario in which mesopredators contribute to the same or to new conflict with humans,” the researchers wrote in their report. “Mesopredators occur at higher densities than apex predators and exhibit greater resiliency to control efforts.”

The problems are not confined to terrestrial ecosystems. Sharks, for instance, are in serious decline due to overfishing. In some places that has led to an explosion in the populations of rays, which in turn caused the collapse of a bay scallop fishery and both ecological an economic losses.

Among the findings of the study:

Primary or apex predators can actually benefit prey populations by suppressing smaller predators, and failure to consider this mechanism has triggered collapses of entire ecosystems.

Cascading negative effects of surging mesopredator populations have been documented for birds, sea turtles, lizards, rodents, marsupials, rabbits, fish, scallops, insects and ungulates.

The economic cost of controlling mesopredators may be very high, and sometimes could be accomplished more effectively at less cost by returning apex predators to the ecosystem.

Human intervention cannot easily replace the role of apex predators, in part because the constant fear of predation alters not only populations but behavior of mesopredators.

Large predators are usually carnivores, but mesopredators are often omnivores and can cause significant plant and crop damage.

The effects of exploding mesopredator populations can be found in oceans, rivers, forests and grasslands around the world.

Reversing and preventing mesopredator release is becoming increasingly difficult and expensive as the world’s top predators continue to edge toward obliteration.

“These problems resist simple solutions,” Ripple said. “I’ve read that when Gen. George Armstrong Custer came into the Black Hills in 1874, he noticed a scarcity of coyotes and the abundance of wolves. Now the wolves are gone in many places and coyotes are killing thousands of sheep all over the West.”

“We are just barely beginning to appreciate the impact of losing our top predators,” he said.

At OSU, Ripple and colleague Robert Beschta have done extensive research and multiple publications on the effect that loss of predators such as wolves and cougars have on ecosystem disruption, not only by allowing increased numbers of grazing animals such as deer and elk, but also losing the fear of predation that changes the behavior of these animals. They have documented ecosystem recovery in Yellowstone National Park after wolves were reintroduced there.

Collaborators on this study included researchers from OSU, the University of California at Berkeley and New Mexico State University at Las Cruces. It was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation.
About the OSU College of Forestry: For a century, the College of Forestry has been a world class center of teaching, learning and research. It offers graduate and undergraduate degree programs in sustaining ecosystems, managing forests and manufacturing wood products; conducts basic and applied research on the nature and use of forests; and operates 14,000 acres of college forests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. William Stozenburg - "Where The Wild Things Were" - Brilliant - up there with "Song Of The Dodo"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. The solution causes the next problem
Attempts to control, control efforts, etc, etc. Our addiction to control, which is our solution, is causing the next problem. If we let go, that would also cause the next problem. We can't win, we can't break even, and we can't get out of the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sort of accurate, but at least we stop putting radio collars on endangered species and ruining their
quality of life. "We had to kill them in order to save them" has got to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mother Nature knows best.
Man fucks it all up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Don't anthropomorphize Mother Nature
(She hates that.)

But seriously, it’s not that “Mother Nature” knows anything. It’s simply that she’s been doing things by trial and error for a very long time; and we’ve only recently become aware of the degree to which we are able to screw things up. (Many of us are still blissfully ignorant about that, reasoning that we are essentially unable to affect something as large as the entire ecosystem.)

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blind_Watchmaker">The Blind Watchmaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. GREED fucks it all up
The solution to the problem is very simple - return the apex predators. That's all it would take, really, and by their nature, the apex predators have lower numbers than the lower-tier predators.

The problem?

Imagine trying to put wolves back in most of the United States. Most people are all for it - the problem is, the ranchers aren't. They feel they'll lose money through predator kills. And since money is the only language politicians understand, the wolves never get reintroduced. Same story with leopards in Asia, or lions in southern Africa.

Of course the plain fact is, simply by the numbers, apex predators kill less livestock than the lower-tier ones. Apex predators tend to be prey-specialized, while the smaller predators are both more numerous and more opportunistic. These ranchers screaming about wolves and lions and whatever, actually end up losing more stock to coyotes and hyenas, respectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. A world without lions and tigers and bears
will be uglier and sadder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I would love to reintroduce Pumas and Wolves to New Jersey.
I think we need them, although I'm sure that many people around here would disagree.

The chief predator for deer around here is the car, although regrettably not the hydrogen HYPErcar or the government subsidized solar powered Tesla car for rich folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voteearlyvoteoften Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Makes sense to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC