Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post: Series of missteps by climate scientists threatens climate-change agenda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:47 PM
Original message
Washington Post: Series of missteps by climate scientists threatens climate-change agenda
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/14/AR2010021404283.html

Series of missteps by climate scientists threatens climate-change agenda

By Juliet Eilperin and David A. Fahrenthold
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, February 15, 2010

With its 2007 report declaring that the "warming of the climate system is unequivocal," the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change won a Nobel Prize -- and a new degree of public trust in the controversial science of global warming.

But recent revelations about flaws in that seminal report, ranging from typos in key dates to sloppy sourcing, are undermining confidence not only in the panel's work but also in projections about climate change. Scientists who have pointed out problems in the report say the panel's methods and mistakes -- including admitting Saturday that it had overstated how much of the Netherlands was below sea level -- give doubters an opening.

It wasn't the first one. There is still a scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change. But in the past year, a cache of stolen e-mails, revealing that prominent climate scientists sought to prevent the publication of works by their detractors, has sullied their image as impartial academics. The errors in the U.N. report -- a document intended to be the last nail in the coffin of climate doubt -- are a serious problem that could end up forcing environmentalists to focus more on the old question of proving that climate change is a threat, instead of the new question of how to stop it.

Two Republican senators who have long opposed a cap on carbon emissions, James M. Inhofe (Okla.) and John Barrasso (Wyo.), are citing the errors as further reasons to block mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Last week, Barrasso called for an http://barrasso.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9a9b602c-d104-2c0e-e6f1-355602f94fe2">independent probe into the IPCC, suggesting that the United States should halt any action on climate until it verifies the panel's scientific conclusions.

...
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ross Ice Shelf. 6 million years ice. Now, not ice.
I was very fond of the Ross Ice Shelf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guardian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I miss the North American Inland Sea
I blame those tyrannosaur deniers. Their extravagant lifestyles and meat-rich diets were to blame. Tyrannosaur prey alone produced millions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane per year. This surely contributed to the mean surface temperature of the Cretaceous being 4 °C above modern level. The warming caused the ocean conveyor to stop, causing an ice age, resulting in a devastating increase in the polar ice caps, thus lowering the sea level and destroying the delicate ecosystem of the North American Inland Sea.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks to profound ignorance (and enablers like the Post) human and a lot of other species
may will go the way of the dinosaurs.

With a quick stopover at Easter Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Fuck the Washington Post
excuse my language but I've seen enough of their coverage on the environment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I don't see the article as "enabling" anything
They're simply reporting the facts.

"Skeptics" are making PR headway. Unable to refute the core science, their strategy appears to be "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_slicing">death by a thousand cuts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Standard propaganda Op, now VERY common about any number of topics
Edited on Mon Feb-15-10 05:39 PM by tom_paine
Global Warming, as it is such a well known issue now for two decades, requires a much larger Op.

The Internet seems to magnify their ability to project and deliver False Realties and Propaganda.

Most recently, even though it is a fact that roughly 95% of Americans got tax cuts under Obama, only 12% believe they did and even more thought their Fed taxes were HIGHER!

I stand in awe and disgust of the evil powers of our Modern Propaganda Machine. In terms of the sheer power of the Propaganda as mated with modern advances in the understanding of psychology, advertising, marketing, PR combined with the power of the "nuclear delivery system" of a corporatized media to make it work.

Basically, it's a "cigarettes don't cause cancer" strategy that the RW/Bushies always use, which obviously becomes more thoroughly advanced and updated so as to present a seamless lie.

On the other side of it, the "death by 1000 cuts" method must prey on some near-universal psychological understanding of people that is beyond my knowledge, but who's outlines are clearly visible because we have all watched it work over and over and OVER again, these last 12 years or more.

The method of attack works every time, that "kill the messenger" attack and event-based thinking vs. scientific thinking (which loses the battle of the PR almost every time). And the other side of it turns down the volume knob on any tiny crack in the False Reality Bubble they generate so even if the truth is out there, no one will hear it anyway.

It seems like it shouldn't work, and if it does that people would catch onto it, especially after the RW "cigarettes don't cause cancer" Propaganda Op was busted wide open.

But if we think about it, the only reason it truly failed was that they got busted in court by their own documents from one of them there "frivolous lawsuits" that actually wasn't quite so frivolous.

If that hadn't happened, maybe 25% of the nation would STILL believe the cigarettes-cancer link was a Lib'rul Lie and 60% more still wouldn't be sure.

It really is an amazing, if not totally creepy sight watching The Lie trump The Truth time and time again. Oh well. It's the Corporations' World, we are just profit centers in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It helps if the audience wants to believe the lie.
"Our product is doubt."

If "skeptics" can produce any doubt about the credibility of the science in people's minds, then people feel free to draw their own conclusion. In the case of a smoker, who wants to continue smoking, they can say, "Well, there's no proof that smoking causes cancer..."

The same strategy works for "Climate Change."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That map is nice if you're a dinosaur...
Not so nice for humans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. This would upset me, except nobody was going to do anything regardless.
This is just the convenient excuse of the month for doing nothing. When the dust settles, there will be another excuse. And then another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. the long emergency
:puke: just like froggies in a kettle. Except frogs don't have the capacity for Evil, like a lot of the bald monkeys do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I still like the "Giant Snail" analogy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'd forgotten that!
Thanks for digging it up again - an odd analogy but fitting in many ways!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC