Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Secret of Sea Level Rise: It Will Vary Greatly by Region

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:24 AM
Original message
The Secret of Sea Level Rise: It Will Vary Greatly by Region
http://www.e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2255
22 Mar 2010: Analysis

The Secret of Sea Level Rise:
It Will Vary Greatly by Region

As the world warms, sea levels could easily rise three to six feet this century. But increases will vary widely by region, with prevailing winds, powerful ocean currents, and even the gravitational pull of the polar ice sheets determining whether some coastal areas will be inundated while others stay dry.

by michael d. lemonick

For at least two decades now, climate scientists have been telling us that CO2 and other human-generated greenhouse gases are warming the planet, and that if we keep burning fossil fuels the trend will continue. Recent projections suggest a global average warming of perhaps 3 to 4 degrees C, or 5.4 to 7 degrees F, by the end of this century.

But those same scientists have also been reminding us consistently that this is just an average. Thanks to all sorts of regional factors — changes in vegetation, for example, or ice cover, or prevailing winds — some areas are likely to warm more than that, while others should warm less.

What’s true for temperature, it turns out, is also true for another frequently invoked consequence of global warming. Sea level, according to the best current projections, could rise by about a meter by 2100, in large part due to melting of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets. But that figure, too, is just a global average. In some places — Scotland, Iceland, and Alaska for example — it could be significantly less in the centuries to come. In others, like much of the eastern United States, it could be significantly more.

And among the most powerful influences on regional sea level is a surprising force: the massive polar ice sheets and their gravitational pull, which will lessen as the ice caps melt and shrink, with profoundly different effects on sea level in various parts of the globe.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. I live less than 100 feet from the Atlantic shoreline. This is eesential info. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're welcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Here is more essential information
Sea level is currently rising at about 3.1 mm per year. That works out to about 282 mm or 11 inches by the end of the century or 12.2 inches per 100 years. 12.2 inches per 100 years is about half the average increase over the last 20,000 or so years.

The 2007 IPCC report estimated that sea level would increase between 7.5 and 23.2 inches by 2100. This article claims that it COULD easily go up by a meter (39 inches). In essence this is nothing but the usual scare tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well...
Here is what the "Copenhagen Diagnosis" http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/authors.html">authors, (many of them IPCC lead authors) had to say in December:

http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/executive_summary.html
...

Acceleration of melting of ice-sheets, glaciers and ice-caps: A wide array of satellite and ice measurements now demonstrate beyond doubt that both the Greenland and Antarctic ice-sheets are losing mass at an increasing rate. Melting of glaciers and ice-caps in other parts of the world has also accelerated since 1990.

Rapid Arctic sea-ice decline: Summer-time melting of Arctic sea-ice has accelerated far beyond the expectations of climate models. The area of summertime sea-ice during 2007-2009 was about 40% less than the average prediction from IPCC AR4 climate models.

Current sea-level rise underestimates: Satellites show great global average sea-level rise (3.4 mm/yr over the past 15 years) to be 80% above past IPCC predictions. This acceleration in sea-level rise is consistent with a doubling in contribution from melting of glaciers, ice caps and the Greenland and West-Antarctic ice-sheets.

Sea-level prediction revised: By 2100, global sea-level is likely to rise at least twice as much as projected by Working Group 1 of the IPCC AR4, for unmitigated emissions it may well exceed 1 meter. The upper limit has been estimated as – 2 meters sea-level rise by 2100. Sea-level will continue to rise for centuries after global temperature have been stabilized and several meters of sea level rise must be expected over the next few centuries.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thank you...once again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's just a tad disingenuous to talk about a 2 foot average
sea level rise per hundred years. Most of that rise happened at the end of the last glaciation 8000 to 18000 years ago. For the last 6000 years or so, while we've been multiplying with biblical enthusiasm and building our civilization, sea levels have been stable. The fact that sea level is now rising again at the rate of 1 foot per 100 years isn't the benign normality that your comment implies. This is something we haven't seen since the neandertalers disappeared. If you don't find that troubling, I certainly admire your phlegmatism, if not your judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting article, and also looks like a very interesting website.
Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You're welcome
and it is an interesting website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Very interesting. At first I thought it was badly stated, but in fact ...
it says exactly what it's meant to say. Surprising that the effect is that large.

(I had thought they were just talking about the "rebound" of land under melting glaciers, but it's something else.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camkay7626 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Flooding the Great Rift
Someone tell me if this is too far out in left field to make sense or make a difference. I was watching a show on National Geographic a couple of years back about the great Rift Valley in Africa. It seems that it is 500 feet below sea level, and will one day the ocean will fill it, creating a sea at least as large as the Mediterranean sea. I began to wonder if, as a last resort, and if sea levels began to threaten the worlds coastal communities and cities, if it might not be a good idea to create a breach that would flood it prematurely. Would this be enough to offset sea level increases and prevent massive flooding and destruction. I realize it would be expensive and destructive to the desert life that is there now, but it could be done slowly with care to protect wildlife and human life that is there now. What do you think? would it work? has anyone looked into it as a possibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC