Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citing 9/11, US Rejects Emission Tax Proposal For Airlines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 09:32 AM
Original message
Citing 9/11, US Rejects Emission Tax Proposal For Airlines
BONN (Reuters) — The United States said on Monday it would be too harsh on airlines to tax emissions of heat-trapping gases from their planes, even though the European Union reaffirmed it was considering measures.

It would be "pretty difficult" to impose extra costs for airlines, said Harlan Watson, the senior U.S. climate negotiator, at a U.N. meeting of government experts to discuss ways to rein in global warming. "We are still recovering from September 11," he said in response to a question, referring to the impact on the airline industry of the 2001 hijacked aircraft attacks in the United States.

"Aviation is growing in some sectors of the world. It's not particularly growing in the United States," he said, adding that many airlines in the United States had been "teetering on the edge of bankruptcy".

The U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that aviation causes 3.5% of global warming, widely blamed on human activities, and that the figure could rise to 15% by 2050."

EDIT

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2005-05-16-climate-control_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. the positive feedback loop of panic
As our economy gets ground down by disappearing oil, and the fallout of climate change, the current clowns in power will just get more desperate to keep the old economy on life support. They'll give ever-bigger tax breaks to most polluting industries, and dismantle whatever environmental regs that they haven't already. Thus making the real problem worse, faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. the Chicago 1944 treaty, is part of the problem
Edited on Tue May-17-05 10:15 AM by rfkrfk
my understanding is,
tax on aviation fuel for international flight is
zero, by this treaty.

if so,
the EU could help out by ditching the treaty.
EU could help by, leading by example.
EU could help by, not asking the unwilling to lead their cause.

the EU seems to blame shrub for issues that
they have control of, WTF, just go do it,

this looks like, /sarcasm/ ,
the EU says, we won't bankrupt our cockroach infested airlines
unless the US goes first.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC