Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BlueOcean Energy proposes floating (LNG) terminal to supply gas to New Jersey (Exxon-Mobil)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:16 AM
Original message
BlueOcean Energy proposes floating (LNG) terminal to supply gas to New Jersey (Exxon-Mobil)
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 08:17 AM by jpak
http://www.blueoceanenergy.com/TheProject/AbouttheProject/tabid/60/Default.aspx

Anchored about 20 miles off the coast of New Jersey and about 30 miles off the coast of New York, the floating LNG terminal will be far from shore and away from shipping lanes, ports and recreational areas. The floating ocean terminal will not be visible from the shoreline.

The BlueOcean Energy terminal will receive liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies from double-hulled LNG ships and store the LNG in insulated tanks inside the terminal's double hull. LNG ships will moor at the floating terminal about twice a week.

The stored LNG will then be warmed to turn it back into natural gas. The natural gas will flow to New Jersey and New York markets through a new subsea pipeline that will connect to new and existing onshore pipeline systems. Local gas utilities will distribute the natural gas to homes and businesses.

Terminal facilities will be able to deliver about 1.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas on an annual average basis, enough to meet the needs of more than 5 million residential customers.

<not much more>

:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why?
Even if we are going to burn natural gas we have more than enough domestic supply.

Wouldn't a pipeline from domestic source in midwest or Texas to NJ make more sense than a LNG port so we can buy even more fossil fuels from foreign sources.

I mean it makes about as much sense as coal port so we can start importing coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. To satisfy New Jersey's *insatiable* demand for fossil fuels
They are also proposing to build *huge* power lines from some of the largest and dirtiest coal-fired plants in West Virginia and PA to supply them with *deadly* coal-fired electricity.

These are the Ambien-addicts that criticize renewable energy development in Maine.

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well I get the fossil fuel addiction...
I just don't get the lets build a massive complex, dangerous, and expensive floating seaport so we can take expensive foreign fossil fuels, then liquify them (at more cost), then ship them halfway around the world (at end more cost), oh btw we can't keep LNG cold so some % boils off into the atmosphere each day (more cost and crap lots more CO2 equivalent).

I mean if you are going to use fossil fuels maybe I am crazy but wouldn't you look for a smarter solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. sounds like a great idea...


that`s just august......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC