Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Concrete Poured On Leningrad II Nuclear Reactor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:42 PM
Original message
First Concrete Poured On Leningrad II Nuclear Reactor.
(Leningrad?!? Whatever.)



A construction licence was issued in July 2009 to plant owner Energoatom for the second unit at Leningrad II by Russian nuclear regulator Rostekhnadzor. The construction licence for the first reactor of Leningrad II was issued in June 2008. The first two units will be of the new AES-2006 model VVER pressurised water reactor (PWR) design. The first of the 1170 MWe reactors is scheduled for commissioning in October 2013 and the second in 2016. These AES-2006 units are expected to be built at a cost of some $3.0-3.7 billion per pair. Leningrad II would eventually boast four AES-2006 reactors.



The Leningrad plant is currently home to four operating 1000 MWe RBMK reactors, all of which are nearing the end of their operating lives. A construction contract for Leningrad II was signed with SPb AEP in August 2007 and site licences granted the following month. AtomEnergoProekt signed a 136 billion rouble ($5.8 billion) state contract in March 2008 for the construction of first two new units at Leningrad II. In addition to supplying electricity, each of the new reactors will provide 1.05 TJ/hr (9.17 PJ/yr) of district heating.


The bold is mine. I especially like the district heating part, since this is recovered energy derived from the second law of thermodynamics. For comparisoon purposes the 9.17 TJ - the entire nation of Denmark produces just 22 PJ of energy from it's whirling pile of soon to be landfilled metal wind turbines - is all energy that would have been wasted, but is now being put to use. (This is the same sort of thing that most dangerous gasoline fueled cars use when one turns the heater on.)

Other reactors using this strategy include the Romanian Cernovoda reactors, the second of which was recently completed, and two others that will come on line this decade.

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Construction_starts_on_second_Leningrad_II_unit-1904104.html">Construction starts on second Leningrad II unit.

The Russian VVER is a pressurized water reactor. It will replace RBMK reactors, the most notorious of which was the Chernobyl 4 reactor, which exploded 24 years ago.

Russia has been aggressively seeking to export the VVER, and is in talks with many countries around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad to see Russia replacing RBMK with VVER.
I am sad it has taken this long. Russian stupidity and poor designs has done more to hurt nuclear energy in last 3 decades than anything the anti-nuke protestors could hope to accomplish.

In 1970s Sierra Club was actually FOR nuclear power because it would have prevented fossil fuel plants. Chernobyl ended that (likely forever). Chernobyl could have been avoided if Russian had moved to PWR/BWR decades ago and/or built a containment structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, if the members of the Sierra Club don't know enough science to tell an RBMK from a PWR, whose
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 07:06 PM by NNadir
problem is that?

I'm no fan of libertarian assholes - and what could possibly be more libertarian than distributed energy fantasies - but in holding to this position of refusing to understand the difference between an RBMK and a PWR, the Sierra Club is obviating the libertarian P.J. O'Rouke's comment that "Some people will do anything for the environment except open a science book."

I'm not real find of excusing people from ethical responsibility to humanity because they are ignorant and too damn lazy to understand the facts.

I lost my taste for the Sierra Club when they were almost taken over by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tortilla_Curtain">Tortilla Curtain type racists.

Their racism has nothing, of course, to do with their anti-nuke mentality, but both are ignorant.

The history of the Sierra Club is one thing - I applaud Muir's fight against the horrible Hetch Hetchy dam - but the reality of the present is quite another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. CHP
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nice about the district heating, this is something missing from all thermal power plants.
And is one reason they're so inefficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh I agree. I have very little respect for Denmark's energy program, but one thing they do well is
wise use of CHP.

CHP is a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC