Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How clean is the electricity I use? - Power Profiler (EPA/US DoE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:52 PM
Original message
How clean is the electricity I use? - Power Profiler (EPA/US DoE)
What's your baseload "mix"?

http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/how-clean.html">The Power Profiler
In the United States, electricity is generated in many different ways, with a wide variation in environmental impact. Electricity generation from the combustion of fossil fuels contributes toward unhealthy air quality, acid rain, and global climate change.

Many electricity customers can choose their provider of electricity or can purchase green power from their utility. In fact, you might now have the option of choosing cleaner, more environmentally friendly sources of energy.

Power Profiler will:

* Determine your power grid region based on your ZIP code and electric utility
* Compare the fuel mix and air emissions rates of the electricity in your region to the national average
* Determine the air emissions impacts of electricity use in your home or business

Power Profiler is very easy to use and takes about 5 minutes. To start, all you need is your ZIP code.

Power Profiler currently uses year 2005 data from EPA’s Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID).

The Power Profiler report will show you the air emissions attributable to the electricity you use in your home or business during one year, along with a description of what these numbers mean in everyday terms.

http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/how-clean.html">The Power Profiler

It uses somewhat old information (2005), but it should still provide pretty reliable numbers for the more established energy sources. I'm sure if it proves popular, the EPA can be persuaded to spend some of the Taxpayers' Hard-Earned Dollars™ (confiscated at gunpoint, of course) to bring it up to date as possible -- say, 2009.

--d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quite cool!
I was reasonably pleased with my results :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. 45% coal, 31% NG, 15% nuclear, 3.5% hydro, 2.6% renewable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. 35% coal, 48% gas, 12% nuke, 0.3% hydro, 1.3% other renewable.
But we recycle, and there is methane recovery at the landfill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I got different results there than I did on the PE Carolinas home page.
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 04:38 PM by Jamastiene
You'd think that living less than 1/8 of a mile form one of the 2 dams ( I can hear the dam when I go outside) in my little town, mine would be primarily hydroelectric. According to the chart, it's over 50% coal for PE Carolinas. :banghead:

Still, thank you for the link. It made me look and I realized I missed out back in 2008 on a chance to join the NC Green Power program ( http://www.ncgreenpower.org/about ). Even as a solid member of the "po' folks," I think I can afford to invest $4 a month for renewable energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. 100% rooftop solar here. is that listed? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emmadoggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. After I put in my ZIP it gives the power company choices and mine isn't listed.
:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow.
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 07:49 PM by Codeine
City of Riverside, CA Public Utilities

9.4% renewables
17.7% hydro
16.5% nuke
1.2% oil
42% gas
11.9% coal

Much better than the national averages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. 27.1% renewables - and that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 10:35 PM by bananas
9.4+17.7 = 27.1% renewables - and that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosenfeld_Effect

The Rosenfeld Effect is the empirical fact that electricity use per capita in California (CA) has been almost flat from 1973 to 2006 whereas use in the US has gone up 50%.

The effect is attributed to energy efficiency, a cause pioneered by Arthur Rosenfeld.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007_energypolicy/index.html

Figure ES-2: California Holds the Line on Electricity Consumption
(Per Capita Electricity Sales in kilowatt hours per person)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. 9.4% non-hydro renewables, 17.7% hydro, 16.5% nuclear
1.2% oil, 42.3% natural gas, and 11.9% coal.

And we have about half the CO2 emissions as the national average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. 27.1% renewables - and that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 10:36 PM by bananas
9.4+17.7 = 27.1% renewables - and that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosenfeld_Effect

The Rosenfeld Effect is the empirical fact that electricity use per capita in California (CA) has been almost flat from 1973 to 2006 whereas use in the US has gone up 50%.

The effect is attributed to energy efficiency, a cause pioneered by Arthur Rosenfeld.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007_energypolicy/index.html

Figure ES-2: California Holds the Line on Electricity Consumption
(Per Capita Electricity Sales in kilowatt hours per person)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Very interesting
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyskye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. My numbers are identical to yours.
You must have PG&E as well. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's actually Redding Electric Utility
but I'm sure the power all comes from the same place. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. My zip uses about half the carbon as everyone else
Makes me happier about charging my electric car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. We can choose. My home is 100% wind powered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Less than 12% coal!!!! Contrary to what some DUers have nastily informed me........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. And that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect!
9.4+17.7 = 27.1% renewables - and that doesn't count negawatts from the Rosenfeld Effect:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosenfeld_Effect

The Rosenfeld Effect is the empirical fact that electricity use per capita in California (CA) has been almost flat from 1973 to 2006 whereas use in the US has gone up 50%.

The effect is attributed to energy efficiency, a cause pioneered by Arthur Rosenfeld.

http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007_energypolicy/index.html

Figure ES-2: California Holds the Line on Electricity Consumption
(Per Capita Electricity Sales in kilowatt hours per person)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Here's an interesting (to me) link of world kwh per capita
Most of the data is 3-4 years old, but I think it would still be fairly close.

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_ele_con_percap-energy-electricity-consumption-per-capita
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I tried some New Jersey zip codes - they use lots of coal!
and their CO2 emissions are about average for the nation.
Even though they use twice as much nuclear as the rest of the country,
they use about the same amount of coal as the rest of the country,
and have their CO2 emissions are about the same as the rest of the country.
This just goes to show that nuclear really doesn't replace coal or reduce CO2 emissions.

Here's the results for Princeton, NJ.
NJ zip codes list: http://www.state.nj.us/infobank/njzips.htm

08540 Princeton Main Office

PSE&G vs. national average:

45.1% 49.6% coal
38.3% 19.3% nuclear
9.6% 18.8% gas

1.63 1.94 Nitrogen Oxide
7.79 5.26 Sulfur Dioxide
1139 1329 Carbon Dioxide

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. 71.7% coal, 19.5% gas, 7.4% hydro, 1.4% other renewables.
Good old Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC