No dangerous affects of sea life? This link lists the affects of 2-butoxyethanol on aquatic species and the word Mortality occurs with alarming frequency.
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/List_AquireAll.jsp?Rec_Id=PC35051 And from the EPA...
GLYCOL ETHERS(1)
(2-METHOXYETHANOL, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-BUTOXYETHANOL)
Glycol ethers have many uses; these include use as solvents and as an ingredient in cleaning compounds, liquid soaps, and cosmetics.
Acute (short-term) exposure to high levels of the glycol ethers in humans results in narcosis, pulmonary edema, and severe liver and kidney damage. Chronic (long-term) exposure to the glycol ethers in humans may result in neurological and blood effects, including fatigue, nausea, tremor, and anemia. No information is available on the reproductive, developmental, or carcinogenic effects of the glycol ethers in humans. Animal studies have reported reproductive and developmental effects from inhalation and oral exposure to the glycol ethers. EPA has not classified the glycol ethers for carcinogenicity.
http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/ Corexit 9527, considered by the EPA to be an acute health hazard, is stated by its manufacturer to be potentially harmful to red blood cells, the kidneys and the liver, and may irritate eyes and skin.<24><13>
The chemical 2-butoxyethanol, found in Corexit 9527, was identified as having caused lasting health problems in workers involved in the cleanup of the Exxon Valdez oil spill.<25> According to the Alaska Community Action on Toxics, the use of Corexit during the Exxon Valdez oil spill caused people "respiratory, nervous system, liver, kidney and blood disorders".<15> Like 9527, 9500 can cause hemolysis (rupture of blood cells) and may also cause internal bleeding.<4>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CorexitI wonder why the sudden backtracking.