Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scallop Population Higher Than Feds Think

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 09:39 AM
Original message
Scallop Population Higher Than Feds Think
Another nautical census:


BOSTON (AP) - The scallop population from Virginia to the Canadian border is twice what the government estimated, according to a new survey which, if accepted by regulators, could expand fishing for the lucrative shellfish. Researchers found an estimated 550 million pounds of scallops after a three-month survey of about 1,850 sites over 16,000 square nautical miles. Researchers said the survey was more precise than earlier sampling. The project, led by scientists at the School for Marine Science and Technology at the University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, aimed to bring new certainty to scallop regulation, which fishermen charge involves too much guesswork.

John Boreman, acting science director at the federal National Marine Science Center, said the video count results are intriguing, but its methods need analysis. Boreman said he plans to meet with UMass-Dartmouth scientists in the spring.

The scallop industry gave about $58,000 to the study and donated boats, food and fuel, said the study's lead researcher, Kevin Stokesbury, a UMass marine biologist. He said industry support didn't influence his findings, and noted that the science must still pass rigorous review by the National Marine Fisheries Service to be accepted.

The scallop industry began to rebound in 1999, after the fisheries service reopened closed scalloping grounds. Last year, scallops pulled in $202 million in revenue in the Northeast.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3382875,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treepig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. perhaps it's the medical marijauna?
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-03 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. sounds like good news
Although I don't like the idea of researchers getting money from industries that have a stake in the outcome of the research. What would have happened if the research showed population estimates were lower than previously believed?? I guess the fishermen would fund more research??? I see this alot; I work for a state agency and many times the stakeholders say they just don't "believe" the data if it does not say what they want it to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC