Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lousiana Diversion Plan A Techno-Bust - AP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 12:23 PM
Original message
Lousiana Diversion Plan A Techno-Bust - AP
NEW ORLEANS - "One year after it opened with fanfare as the "world's largest freshwater diversion," Davis Pond has only intermittently been turned on to beat back salt water intrusion into Louisiana's dying coast.

Since August last year, the $119.6 million structure has operated for about three months at much lower rates than it is capable of. 'We thought we'd be sitting back right now and have a project that was behaving like it was supposed to,' said Jack Fredine, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Davis Pond project manager. 'It's been frustrating for the last seven to eight months.'

EDIT

But shortly after the first diversions, officials realized the ponding area was not draining properly because the rock shoreline was blocked by floating marsh that had risen up with the river water and acted like a dam, Fredine said. Floating, or flotant marsh, as its name suggests, floats on top of water. Engineers were unaware that the area in front of the rock shoreline was flotant marsh, despite having done surveys and taken samples.

EDIT

Diverting water is estimated to preserve about one square mile a year over the next 50 years, and create bountiful fishing and recreational grounds worth millions of dollars. Even if Davis Pond functioned as it should, the Barataria Basin is expected to lose 11 square miles a year for the foreseeable future."

EDIT

Yahoo News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps the model used to justify the project used the wrong assumptions.
I know that happened with the Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway Development.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC