Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Now Producing Natural Gas from Wastewater

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Nathanael Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:19 PM
Original message
California Now Producing Natural Gas from Wastewater
Continuing to barrel forward towards its renewable energy targets, California has added another state clean energy first.

Southern California Gas Co. and its partner, the city of Escondido, have announced they are successfully producing purified wastewater biogas.

The Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility, which converts raw methane gas produced in the treatment of wastewater into pipeline-quality natural gas is the first of its kind to come online in California.

Link: http://www.energyboom.com/biofuels/california-now-producing-natural-gas-from-wastewater
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. To be fair that's not a clean energy source, you still burn the gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But isn't it carbon-neutral?
I.e., the carbon in the garbage was pretty much already in circulation & putting in a landfill isn't exactly sequestering it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No not at all.
It's the difference between a landfill and burning garbage. While landfills do release into the air they do so over decades, hundreds of years or even longer, incinerating it in a combustion engine is getting rid of it very quickly. Nothing ever leaves the carbon cycle. The problem is that we're unbalancing the cycle by putting much more into the air than should be there without human interference. Climate change... etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnlinePoker Donating Member (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. If the gas is methane, then I'm all for it.
Methane is, if I remember right, 20x more potent as a green house gas. If you burn it, it breaks down (with the addition of 2 O2 molecules) into 1 CO2 and 2 H2O molecules so the methane atmospheric GHG potency is reduced by 20 times. At the same time, the burning produces electricity which would have to be sourced from somewhere else. The methane is produced no matter what is done (if it is left in the land fill to rot, for instance), so it should be harnessed to do some good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yeah but that goes right over many heads around here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. 20x as potent but 12% of global warming. Why? Because it has a short life.
CO2 remains the largest contributor to warming, but the clathrates are the biggest concern. It's all about feedbacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The same thing is done at landfills that trap methane...
Edited on Tue Feb-08-11 11:35 PM by Fearless
However, in the landfills you then don't have CO2 emissions on the levels you're talking about. While neither is perfect for a variety of reasons, the landfill, some electricity, and little CO2 in the air is better than the electricity, the perpetuation of fossil fuel usage, and some electricity, and a lot of CO2 released.

Regardless, my point is it is not a CLEAN energy source like solar or wind for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. very cool. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. This story is a load of crap!
I'm not even going to read it. Nor post a reply. And I'm definitely am not going to K&R this crap!
:sarcasm:
(just kidding)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Good move California!
Here's hoping that it soon spreads to other cities.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC