Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nuclear Whistleblower Renaissance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:51 AM
Original message
The Nuclear Whistleblower Renaissance
You can't have a Nuclear Renaissance without a Nuclear Whistleblower Renaissance.
A lot of people aren't going to understand what just happened in Iran.
Russian scientists working on-site blew the whistle on a number of serious safety problems.
They appealed directly to the Kremlin to intervene, warning of "another Chernobyl".
Their warning was reported by major news media around the world.
And now apparently the Kremlin has intervened.
The fuel rods are being removed for inspection.

These expensive delays and repairs are not caused by "anti-nukes" or "environmentalists".
These expensive delays are caused by the inherently dangerous process of generating electricity using nuclear fission.

Conservative "pro-nukes" try to blame the collapse of the US nuclear industry on Jimmy Carter, Amory Lovins, Jane Fonda, and other Democrats, environmentalists, and "Hollywood libruls".
The fact is that orders for new reactors collapsed in 1974, and cancellations for existing orders began to skyrocket in 1974.
Jimmy Carter wasn't inaugurated until January 1977 - three years after reactor orders collapsed.
Amory Lovins famous "Road Not Taken" Foreign Affairs article was in 1976 - two years after reactor orders collapsed.
Jane Fonda's movie "The China Syndrome" wasn't until 1979 - 5 years after reactor orders collapsed.
And most of the environmental protests were in the late 1970s and 1980s, years after reactor orders collapsed.

These new delays at Bushehr aren't caused by Jimmy Carter, Jane Fonda, or Amory Lovins,
although I won't be surprised if conservative idiots try to blame them for it.
We don't know if the Kremlin was embarrassed into taking action by the news reports, or if it was going to take action anyway. But the news reports certainly put the pressure on all levels of management to respect the whistleblowers.

Nuclear energy isn't needed to solve global warming - as Al Gore says, we have enough resources to solve two or three climate crises.
Nuclear energy isn't needed to solve peak oil - even M.K. Hubbert became strongly anti-nuclear and pro-solar when he realized just how difficult the problems with nuclear energy are.
We address the right in harsh terms, and we fully intend to make the word "conservative" absolutely radioactive. In that spirit, DU has already gained countrywide notoriety as the originator of the weekly Top Ten Conservative Idiots list ...

- from "About Democratic Underground" at http://www.democraticunderground.com/about.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. All electrical generation is "inherently dangerous".
To pretend otherwise is dishonest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I've heard that AC can kill an elephant. DC is much safer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. SNORT! Awwww, I just got this keyboard cleaned up from last week...! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. More from TASS
Edited on Mon Feb-28-11 01:50 PM by kristopher
http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=15997701&PageNum=0

MOSCOW, February 28 (Itar-Tass) -- Nuclear fuel will be removed from the reactor at the Bushehr nuclear power plant because of damage to internal elements of pumps used for cleaning the internal surface of the reactor from foreign particles.

“The unloading of the fuel from the power unit at Bushehr is a necessary measure of precaution because internal elements were found to be damaged in one of the four cooling pumps. This raised suspicions that metal particles could get into the reactor with water and reach the fuel assembly after passing through the internal elements of the reactor,” Rosatom said on Monday, February 28.
-END-


Not surprisingly (considering Moscow's huge push to sell reactors to anyone) they don't mention the real problem at all. I'm guessing the Stuxnet virus is an all-too-real example of why these facilities are accurately described as predeployed weapons of mass destruction for terrorists and enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Somewhat false.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 03:27 PM by Confusious
Reactor orders collapsed because of a lack of demand in electricity.

Reactors that were ordered had to scrapped because of everything you mentioned. In the face of that, no one tried to build new reactors for 30 years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_canceled_nuclear_plants_in_the_United_States

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC