Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radiation Plume Modelers Chafe at Scarcity of Data (sciencemag.org)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 08:28 PM
Original message
Radiation Plume Modelers Chafe at Scarcity of Data (sciencemag.org)
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/03/radiation-plume-modelers-chafe.html?ref=hp

Atmospheric modelers are still warily watching the spread of radionuclides from the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant as workers there struggle to bring the situation under control. "The wind is blowing everything out to sea, so they've been lucky so far," says Andreas Stohl of the Norwegian Institute for Air Research. Modelers' biggest problem at the moment is scant knowledge of how much radioactive material is actually escaping from Fukushima.

"The data flow is very incoherent," Stohl says. The weather is also causing concern as the forecasts currently show a change in wind direction on Sunday night and Monday that could blow contamination toward Tokyo. "Things may change in the meanwhile," says Gerhard Wotawa of Austria's Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics in Vienna. "But if the worst happens , then that could cause problems there ."

Modelers have to first estimate how much material is coming from the Fukushima plant, known as the "source term," and then take current wind field data provided by, for example, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. Then they plug all this into an atmospheric model to predict how the material will spread over the coming days. Stohl says information on the source term is so scarce that his model has had to rely in part on media information. Wotawa, on the other hand, has access to data from radionuclide sensors belonging to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization for his model.

CTBTO has a network of different types of sensors scattered around the globe to detect signs of clandestine nuclear cheats. Of the 60 radionuclide stations currently operating, there are more than 20 on islands in the Pacific and around the Pacific Rim. Such sensors would be a valuable resource when dealing with a nuclear accident, but the organization's mandate says the information can be given only to signatory governments, not released publicly. CTBTO radionuclide stations test for radioactive particles; air filters are checked once daily with a gamma-ray detector to identify what radionuclides may be present and in what quantities. It takes 2 or 3 days for the information to get to the signatory governments. Wotawa says that there were problems with early data from one of the two stations in Japan this week, first because of a power failure following the earthquake and then because of contamination of the filter. Those problems have now been resolved and he is expecting the latest data tomorrow.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. bedtime kick - this again shows how little information is available about this disaster
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marblehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. wind is blowing
everything out to sea, towards us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC