Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High radiation outside Japan's evacuation zone, says IAEA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:42 PM
Original message
High radiation outside Japan's evacuation zone, says IAEA
http://www.sify.com/news/high-radiation-outside-japan-s-evacuation-zone-says-iaea-news-international-ldweEcgiaih.html

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Monday that high radiation levels were measured recently not only inside, but also outside the 20-km evacuation zone around Japan's stricken Fukushima nuclear plant.

Asked whether Japan's authorities should consider widening the exclusion zone, a senior IAEA official said: 'There should be a consideration about this.' The official requested anonymity.

At the same time, IAEA officials said radiation rates are declining and levels are not unhealthy in dozens of Japanese cities including Tokyo, for which the Vienna-based agency is receiving official Japanese data.

On Sunday, one measurement 58 km from Fukushima registered 5.7 microsieverts per hour, the IAEA said in data provided to reporters.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riverbendviewgal Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is scary
I can't help but think of that movie I saw when I was young - ON THE BEACH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Really? 5.7 microsieverts per hour is the same as a world wide nuclear attack in a movie?
There are still 8,766 hours in a sideral year.

This amounts to a yearly exposure, ignoring something called, um, nuclear decay - the radioactive decay law, dN = -kdt, shows that activity is inversely proportional to lifetime - amounts to 49 mSv per year.

It's the equivalent of three CT scans in a year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert

I strongly suspect that more people died from air pollution from driving to drive ins to see "On the Beach" than have been killed by CT scans.

But you never know. Maybe a nuclear war is the equivalent of a nuclear war.

Maybe, though, a paranoid reaction to the world's largest, by far, source of climate change gas free primary energy might have an effect on the next tsunami.

D'ya think?

Have a nice day tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You won't get it until someone dear to you contracts cancer from radiation
It happens, and it's ugly. No amount of radiation is "safe", you ought to know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No amount of radiation is "safe"? Really?
Do you spend anytime outside, being bombarded radiation coming from the evil nuclear reactor in the sky?

Do you spend anytime time inside, being bombarded by radiation coming from radon decay?

Do you spend anytime in front a computer...


Oh, nevermind. It's clear we are dealing with some serious ignorance here.

FYI: As far as anyone dear to me having cancer, my father was diagnosed with skin cancer about 6 years ago. Thanks to an eleven week course of radiation treatments, he's still alive today and cancer free. I'm certainly glad he didn't get your memo that "no amount of radiation is safe..." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. High enough to get het up about, but not high enough to harm anyone,
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 01:00 AM by kestrel91316
if you listen to TPTB. They take us for fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC