Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

does anybody have any links/info on water usage by solar plants?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:15 PM
Original message
does anybody have any links/info on water usage by solar plants?
also re: data center cooling plants/towers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.
I don't have any links like that on me. But I do hear that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRUl1mJQHmc&feature=player_embedded">"tidal power" uses a whole bunch of water.

- In fact it's drowning in it......


K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. They do need to hose down those panels one in a while. You know, radioactive dust. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Night Crawler Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's some info on Palo Verde Nuclear power facility
It's the largest operating Nuclear Power facility in the world, it's in the middle of the Arizona desert.

Located in the Arizona desert, Palo Verde is the only nuclear generating facility in the world that is not situated adjacent to a large body of above-ground water. The facility evaporates water from the treated sewage of several nearby municipalities to meet its cooling needs.(snip)
20 billion US gallons (76,000,000 m³) of treated water are evaporated each year.This water represents about 25% of the annual overdraft of the Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area. At the nuclear plant site, the wastewater is further treated and stored in an 80 acre (324,000 m²) reservoir for use in the plant's cooling towers.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palo_Verde_Nuclear_Generating_Station
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. um, thanks
but I was looking for info on solar facilities:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Night Crawler Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I know, this is for comparison if someone finds it.
I haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. apparently, depending on the type of system, they can use as much as coal or nuke
I was kind of shocked. Found this from 2009 and just attended a meeting with info for our local watershed group. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/business/energy-environment/30water.html?_r=1&ref=earth&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. You could try this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. didn't see anything about water use
in the article or the thread

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. 1,500 to 3,000 acre feet per year
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 11:55 PM by Confusious
http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/13/concentrated-solar-thermal-power-csp-with-storage/

Kind of a bullshit article. They probably underplay things.

"Yes, at $1 billion, this 200 MW plant is on the pricey side — though not as staggeringly pricey as new nuclear power”

A new nuke at these prices would cost $7.5 billion. Which is a comparable price... and it will last 80 years, not 20 or 40.

Says "thermal storage." They'll be heating up water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC