Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No need to worry about Tokyo tap water, officials say

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:25 AM
Original message
No need to worry about Tokyo tap water, officials say
Tokyo tap water is again within acceptable drinking limits for infants, after briefly testing too radioactive. Meanwhile, three workers at the stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant were injured Thursday.

The radioactivity of Tokyo tap water came within acceptable drinking limits for infants on Thursday, prompting Japanese officials to drop restrictions that had been raised a day earlier. But that positive news came as officials also announced that more three workers at the stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant were injured.

Tests on Thursday at the Kanamichi Water Purification Plant, which provides water to Tokyo, showed 79 becquerels of radioactive iodine per kilogram of water – bringing it under the 100 becquerels per liter limit for infants. The acceptable limit for adults it is 300. Yesterday officials measured it at 210.

Yet even at that above-normal level, scientists said there was no need for alarm. Otsura Niwa, a Kyoto University professor emeritus of radiation biology, told the Mainichi Daily News that "Japan's standards are too strict in the first place. Even if babies are given tap water, their parents don't have to worry too much about it."

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2011/0324/Japan-nuclear-update-No-need-to-worry-about-Tokyo-tap-water-officials-say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Parents don't have to worry too much?
How much should they worry? I hope this is a true reading on the levels since they don't have much choice on whether to use the water or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. They have plenty to worry about.
When will their power be on or off? Will their place of employment be open, or closed because of a lack of power or materials? Will the logistics of supplying food to a large city be able to keep up with fuel shortages and trains that lack power?

Plenty to worry about. This incredibly tiny level of radiation in drinking water for a few days isn't one of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. And tomorrow it will measure something else.....
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 09:31 AM by marmar
I don't think I'd take the chance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Me neither...at this point I'd be very, very skeptical about any 'official' pronouncements regarding
..safety and various hazards..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes... but remember that the half-life on radioiodine is quite short.
And it's a fission product.

It's possible that levels will flutuate depending on when the plume was over the watershed for Tokyo... they could certainly go higher.

But they wouldn't be higher for long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's ok, it's safe
until it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. The main object of the media is to
scare the hell out of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. What about the pipes and water treatment facilities?
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 10:08 AM by crickets
The radioactive water was flowing through and sitting in the pipes and other plumbing infrastructure for some time. So what is their condition now and how does that affect any less radioactive water flowing through them later? Have fluctuating levels of radioactivity affected the status of the pipes, and will they continue to do so over time? Is there a cumulative effect as radiation levels rise and fall? Is this this a type of radiation that can be flushed out with clean water, and how much does it take before the pipes are clean? I'm not trying to make more out of this than there is -- it's bad enough already. I'm genuinely curious.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The detected levels were FAR lower than anything that would cause that kind of concern.
There wouldn't be any damage at all to equipment or distribution infrastructure. Not even at levels thousands of times as high.

Yes, radioiodine can be flushed away with water, but it also goes away entirely on it's own over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC