|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 10:56 PM Original message |
How will things turn out w/reactor No.3? Chose how far it goes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. I understand the bottom of the reactor vessel to be about 5 inches thick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 11:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I wonder if they have doubts about it holding and why nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 02:56 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. 7/8" of a total of 8" IIRC. (Your 5 might be the correct figure.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 08:50 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I wondered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 11:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. yeah, it's the public's fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 01:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. In part yes. Public sentiment, or fear of that public sentiment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's not so much reactor 3 or even 1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 11:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Wow, that's a huge change in approach, I applaud them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 12:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. It's all three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 08:36 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. But we have been told right here on DU there was no fission occurring in the scrammed reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 10:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. What do you think the FIRST clue would be of active fission? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buddysmellgood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 12:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/27_12.html |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crickets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 12:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Jawdrop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 01:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I want to tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 06:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
11. No active fission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Not with those short-lived isotopes in those quantities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 10:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. True, but there would be other signs of active fission. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 09:10 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Maybe it's a distillation effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
21. no no no no no no no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 11:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. So I guess this is the magical undercover active fission? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
15. Where's the floor of the refueling bay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-11 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. TEPCO Repents and Retracts - Great News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC