|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
BridgeTheGap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:28 PM Original message |
Bury the Nuclear Renaissance Once and for All |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. More lies than is even usual for this nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Just because you don't want to believe it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Except that it contradicts science. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Live in denial, I could care less |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CRH (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Fukishima contradicts what was thought to be, sound science, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:41 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Actually no, it doesn't. But tuck that idea in bed at night and give it a kiss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PamW (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. How does Fukishima contradict science?????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jan Steinman (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Uhm... there's 5,000 studies summarized in this book! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. The study was published by Wiley-Blackwell, a highly credible academic publisher. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I dismiss it because it conflicts with scientific fact. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Maybe YOUR science, but clearly not ALL science....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. You can dismiss what you want. Here's the review extract in the Journal of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. You can purchase it for $34. That tells you something, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Which mortality stats from Iraq did you trust - the "official" count or the Lancet Study? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
18. Apparently one of the effects of radiation is exaggeration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. More smearing of science that negatively impacts the fission industry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Deleted message |
Jan Steinman (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. By "all known science" you mean "all the science *I* know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Amen! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frebrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. K&R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Quants rule! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fledermaus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. "He's dead Jim." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. "Bird populations in California plummeted a month after Chernobyl... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC