|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 09:07 PM Original message |
Radioactive leak into sea was 20,000 times above limit: TEPCO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caraher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. They might as well just say "gobs of radioactive material" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 10:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. 135,135 Curies. For those who prefer Ci to Bq like me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I'd love to see you have that attitude if it was your food supply that was at risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. Multiply by 10, or maybe 110, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-22-11 10:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Except that the numbers are independently verifiable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yes, and I think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 03:36 AM Original message |
This is Japan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Someguyinjapan (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 03:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. This is Japan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 08:29 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. By whom? When? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 11:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Really? What magical mechanism is in place to do this "independent" sampling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Any group on earth has the capacity to go out and take samples of seawater in the area. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. In other words a system for independent verification and responsibility doesn't exist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. There also isn't any evidence that they lied about anything either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Given the history of the fission reactor industry it is reasonable to doubt your/their veracity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Because people watch the nuclear industry like a hawk maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I see far more of the nuclear sales force than its critics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I don't have one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 02:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. That is a direct vested interest in the nuclear industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Lets say you're right, how does that make anything I said wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 03:21 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Nuclear industry data has serious problems with credibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 04:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. If everything they do is for higher profit, and that is true, then why don't they do it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 04:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. That doesn't address the point I made - twice now you've avoided it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 05:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I never said we needed it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Do you understand the difference between a centralized grid and a distributed grid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 12:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I'm tend to agree with you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. With TEPCO one is truly "Lost in Translation" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CJvR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 04:34 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Cute little Chernobyl |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-23-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I take this to be direct release into coastal waters - it may not include atmospheric deposition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpoonFed (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 04:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
28. wow, within 24 hours of this post, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC