Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuke Plant Inspections Find Flaws in Disaster Readiness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 05:59 PM
Original message
Nuke Plant Inspections Find Flaws in Disaster Readiness
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=nuke-plant-inspections-fi

Nuke Plant Inspections Find Flaws in Disaster Readiness

Problems with emergency equipment and disaster procedures are far more pervasive than publicly describe

By John Sullivan, Ariel Wittenberg and ProPublica | June 30, 2011

A special inspection of U.S. nuclear plants after the Fukushima disaster in Japan revealed problems with emergency equipment and disaster procedures that are far more pervasive than publicly described by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a review of inspection reports by ProPublica shows.

While the deficiencies don't pose an immediate risk and are relatively easy to fix, critics say they could complicate the response to a major disaster and point to a weakness in NRC oversight.



Agency officials unveiled the http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/follow-up-rpts.html">results in May, stating in http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1114/ML111400475.pdf">a news release that "out of 65 operating reactor sites, 12 had issues with one or more of the requirements during the inspections."

But ProPublica's examination of the reports found that http://www.propublica.org/article/nuclear-plants-and-disasters-nrc-inspection-results">60 plant sites had deficiencies that ranged from broken machinery, missing equipment and poor training to things like blocked drains or a lack of preventive maintenance. Some of the more serious findings include:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. SciAm are a bunch of anti-nuke luddites. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was hoping to find a :sarcasm: under your title but then I didn't see the nt
So you actually think our nuclear plants are ready for a disaster. I certainly don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Usually what I write...
that sounds bat-shit insane is sarcasm. Have you missed all my "anti-nuke radiation-fearing-of-out-stupidity" posts on the forum in the past?

I do think nuke plants are ready for a disaster.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ready
#8... imminent.

Language is such a wonderful thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Since I don't know people by name here it is hard to tell sometimes...
just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I really like that Scientific American is printing this type of news
They have a great image and reputation world wide.

Whenever I post an article from them I include their name in the title because it makes more people read it.

anyway kick and nominate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Scientific American is a joke
which anyone with letters after their name wouldn't be caught dead reading.

Are Aliens Among Us?

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=are-aliens-among-us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. All the article states is that microbes from space could have
jumpstarted life on earth 3 billion of years ago and then interviews
and top scientists.


The idea is not nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I subscribed to SA for twenty years
1970-1990, and it's truly sad what's become of it.

In 1970 it was a solid digest across the spectrum of current scientific research. A highlight was Martin Gardner's Mathematical Games, which was challenging and delved into knot, number, and combinatorial theory.

The magazine was bought and sold, and when OMNI magazine folded in the 80s SA jumped in to take it's place with prurient trash-tabloid titles and dumbed-down writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Translation:
wtmusic wrote:
"I subscribed to SA for twenty years 1970-1990, and it's truly sad what's become of it.
In 1970 it was a solid digest across the spectrum of current scientific research. A highlight was Martin Gardner's Mathematical Games, which was challenging and delved into knot, number, and combinatorial theory.
The magazine was bought and sold, and when OMNI magazine folded in the 80s SA jumped in to take it's place with prurient trash-tabloid titles and dumbed-down writing."



Translation:
"They publish articles that hurt the nuclear power industry."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Hahahaaha.

" I was hoping to find a :sarcasm: under your title but..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC